Stemmann Heiko, Freiwald Winrich A
Institute for Brain Research and Center for Advanced Imaging, University of Bremen, D-28334 Bremen, Germany, and.
The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065.
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 23;36(47):11918-11928. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1888-16.2016.
Attentional selection requires the interplay of multiple brain areas. Theoretical accounts of selective attention predict different areas with different functional properties to support endogenous covert attention. To test these predictions, we devised a demanding attention task requiring motion discrimination and spatial selection and performed whole-brain imaging in macaque monkeys. Attention modulated the early visual cortex, motion-selective dorsal stream areas, the lateral intraparietal area, and the frontal eye fields. This pattern of activation supports early selection, feature-based, and biased-competition attention accounts, as well as the frontoparietal theory of attentional control. While high-level motion-selective dorsal stream areas did not exhibit strong attentional modulation, ventral stream areas V4d and the dorsal posterior inferotemporal cortex (PITd) did. The PITd in fact was, consistently across task variations, the most significantly and most strongly attention-modulated area, even though it did not exhibit signs of motion selectivity. Thus the recruitment of the PITd in attention tasks involving different kinds of motion analysis is not predicted by any theoretical account of attention. These functional data, together with known anatomical connections, suggest a general and possibly critical role of the PITd in attentional selection.
Attention is the key cognitive function that selects sensory information relevant to the current goals, relegating other information to the shadows of consciousness. To better understand the neural mechanisms of this interplay between sensory processing and internal cognitive state, we must learn more about the brain areas supporting attentional selection. Here, to test theoretical accounts of attentional selection, we used a novel task requiring sustained attention to motion. We found that, surprisingly, among the most strongly attention-modulated areas is one that is neither selective for the sensory feature relevant for current goals nor one hitherto thought to be involved in attentional control. This discovery suggests a need for an extension of current theoretical accounts of the brain circuits for attentional selection.
注意力选择需要多个脑区的相互作用。选择性注意的理论解释预测,具有不同功能特性的不同脑区支持内源性隐蔽注意。为了检验这些预测,我们设计了一项要求较高的注意任务,该任务需要进行运动辨别和空间选择,并在猕猴身上进行了全脑成像。注意力调节了早期视觉皮层、运动选择性背侧通路区域、外侧顶内区和额叶眼区。这种激活模式支持早期选择、基于特征和偏向竞争的注意解释,以及注意控制的额顶叶理论。虽然高级运动选择性背侧通路区域没有表现出强烈的注意调制,但腹侧通路区域V4d和背侧颞下后皮质(PITd)表现出了这种调制。事实上,尽管PITd没有表现出运动选择性的迹象,但在各种任务变化中,它始终是受注意调制最显著、最强的区域。因此,在涉及不同类型运动分析的注意任务中,PITd的参与并未被任何注意理论所预测。这些功能数据,连同已知的解剖连接,表明PITd在注意选择中具有普遍且可能关键的作用。
注意力是一种关键的认知功能,它选择与当前目标相关的感觉信息,而将其他信息置于意识的阴影之中。为了更好地理解感觉处理与内部认知状态之间这种相互作用的神经机制,我们必须更多地了解支持注意选择的脑区。在这里,为了检验注意选择的理论解释,我们使用了一项需要持续注意运动的新任务。我们发现,令人惊讶的是,在受注意调制最强的区域中,有一个区域既不对与当前目标相关的感觉特征具有选择性,也不是迄今为止认为参与注意控制的区域。这一发现表明,需要扩展当前关于注意选择的脑回路理论解释。