Patel Gaurav H, Yang Danica, Jamerson Emery C, Snyder Lawrence H, Corbetta Maurizio, Ferrera Vincent P
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032;
State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY 10036;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 28;112(30):9454-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420395112. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
Macaques are often used as a model system for invasive investigations of the neural substrates of cognition. However, 25 million years of evolution separate humans and macaques from their last common ancestor, and this has likely substantially impacted the function of the cortical networks underlying cognitive processes, such as attention. We examined the homology of frontoparietal networks underlying attention by comparing functional MRI data from macaques and humans performing the same visual search task. Although there are broad similarities, we found fundamental differences between the species. First, humans have more dorsal attention network areas than macaques, indicating that in the course of evolution the human attention system has expanded compared with macaques. Second, potentially homologous areas in the dorsal attention network have markedly different biases toward representing the contralateral hemifield, indicating that the underlying neural architecture of these areas may differ in the most basic of properties, such as receptive field distribution. Third, despite clear evidence of the temporoparietal junction node of the ventral attention network in humans as elicited by this visual search task, we did not find functional evidence of a temporoparietal junction in macaques. None of these differences were the result of differences in training, experimental power, or anatomical variability between the two species. The results of this study indicate that macaque data should be applied to human models of cognition cautiously, and demonstrate how evolution may shape cortical networks.
猕猴常被用作认知神经基础侵入性研究的模型系统。然而,人类和猕猴与其最后的共同祖先在2500万年前就开始分化,这可能极大地影响了认知过程(如注意力)所依赖的皮质网络的功能。我们通过比较猕猴和人类执行相同视觉搜索任务时的功能磁共振成像数据,研究了注意力所依赖的额顶叶网络的同源性。尽管存在广泛的相似性,但我们发现了这两个物种之间的根本差异。首先,人类比猕猴拥有更多的背侧注意力网络区域,这表明在进化过程中,人类的注意力系统相对于猕猴有所扩展。其次,背侧注意力网络中潜在的同源区域在表征对侧半视野方面存在明显不同的偏向,这表明这些区域的潜在神经结构在最基本的属性(如感受野分布)上可能存在差异。第三,尽管这项视觉搜索任务明确显示人类腹侧注意力网络存在颞顶联合节点的功能证据,但我们在猕猴中未发现颞顶联合的功能证据。这些差异均不是由两个物种在训练、实验能力或解剖变异性方面的差异导致的。这项研究的结果表明,猕猴的数据应谨慎应用于人类认知模型,并证明了进化如何塑造皮质网络。