Thorlund Kristian, Sun-Edelstein Christina, Druyts Eric, Kanters Steve, Ebrahim Shanil, Bhambri Rahul, Ramos Elodie, Mills Edward J, Lanteri-Minet Michel, Tepper Stewart
Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Redwood Outcomes, 302-1505 2nd Ave. West, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0696-8. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
The most commonly prescribed medications used to treat migraine acutely are single analgesics, ergots, opioids, and triptans. Due to varying mechanisms of action across drug classes, there is reason to believe that some classes may be less likely than others to elicit Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) than others. We therefore aimed to determine whether certain classes of acute migraine drugs are more likely to elicit MOH than others.
A comprehensive systematic literature was conducted to identify studies of varying designs that reported on MOH within the considered treatment classes. Only studies that reported MOH according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) were considered. Since no causal comparative design studies were identified; data from prevalence studies and surveys were retrieved. Prevalence-based relative risks between treatment classes were calculated by integrating both medication overuse and medication use from published studies. For each pair wise comparison, pooled relative risks were calculated as the inverse variance weighted average.
A total of 29 studies informed the relative risk between treatment classes, all of which reported country-specific data. Five studies reported country-specific medication use data. For triptans versus analgesics the study relative risks generally favored triptans. The pooled relative risk was 0.65 (i.e., relative risk reduction of 35 %). For ergots versus analgesics, a similar trend was observed in favor of ergots with a relative risk of 0.41. For triptans versus ergots, the direction of effect was mixed, and the pooled relative risk was 1.07. Both triptans and ergots appeared favorable when compared to opioids, with pooled relative risks of 0.35 and 0.76, respectively. However, the evidence was limited for these comparisons. Analgesics and opioids also appeared to yield similar risk of MOH (pooled relative risk 1.09).
Our study suggests that in patients receiving acute migraine treatment, analgesics and opioids are associated with a higher risk of developing MOH compared with other treatments. These findings provide incentive for better monitoring of use of analgesics and opioids for treating acute migraine, and suggest possible clinical preference for use of so-called "migraine-specific" treatments, that is, triptans and ergots.
用于急性治疗偏头痛最常用的处方药是单一镇痛药、麦角制剂、阿片类药物和曲坦类药物。由于不同药物类别作用机制不同,因此有理由相信某些类别引发药物过量使用性头痛(MOH)的可能性可能低于其他类别。因此,我们旨在确定某些类别的急性偏头痛药物引发MOH的可能性是否高于其他药物。
进行了一项全面的系统文献检索,以识别不同设计的研究,这些研究报告了所考虑治疗类别中的MOH。仅纳入根据国际头痛疾病分类(ICHD)报告MOH的研究。由于未识别出因果比较设计研究,因此检索了患病率研究和调查的数据。通过整合已发表研究中的药物过量使用和药物使用情况,计算治疗类别之间基于患病率的相对风险。对于每对比较,合并相对风险计算为逆方差加权平均值。
共有29项研究提供了治疗类别之间的相对风险信息,所有这些研究均报告了特定国家的数据。五项研究报告了特定国家的药物使用数据。对于曲坦类药物与镇痛药的比较,研究相对风险总体上有利于曲坦类药物。合并相对风险为0.65(即相对风险降低35%)。对于麦角制剂与镇痛药的比较,观察到类似的趋势有利于麦角制剂,相对风险为0.41。对于曲坦类药物与麦角制剂的比较,效应方向不一,合并相对风险为1.07。与阿片类药物相比,曲坦类药物和麦角制剂似乎都更有利,合并相对风险分别为0.35和0.76。然而,这些比较的证据有限。镇痛药和阿片类药物引发MOH 的风险似乎也相似(合并相对风险1.09)。
我们的研究表明,在接受急性偏头痛治疗的患者中,与其他治疗方法相比,镇痛药和阿片类药物引发MOH的风险更高。这些发现促使人们更好地监测用于治疗急性偏头痛的镇痛药和阿片类药物的使用情况,并表明可能更倾向于使用所谓的“偏头痛特异性”治疗方法,即曲坦类药物和麦角制剂。