经传统及斑点追踪超声心动图评估的经导管主动脉瓣置入术后左心室适应性
Left ventricular adaptation after TAVI evaluated by conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography.
作者信息
Dimitriadis Zisis, Scholtz Smita, Ensminger Stephan, Wiemer Marcus, Fischbach Thomas, Scholtz Werner, Piper Cornelia, Börgermann Jochen, Bitter Thomas, Horstkotte Dieter, Faber Lothar
机构信息
Clinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Clinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
出版信息
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:633-637. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.035. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
OBJECTIVE
Our study aimed to evaluate myocardial adaption and outcome after transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI TF) for severe aortic stenosis by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and speckle tracking analysis.
METHODS AND RESULTS
From 168 patients who underwent TAVI TF between 2010 and 2013 in our institution, n=95 with a follow-up period ≥3months were included and grouped (G) according to baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; G1: LVEF<40%, G2: 40%-55%, G3: >55%). LV function was evaluated using conventional and speckle-tracking based parameters. Mortality was tracked up to 60months. Aortic valve orifice diameter and mean aortic gradient improved significantly after TAVI. LV dimensions and LVEF remained largely unchanged. Systolic function significantly improved in G1 (LVEF, p<0.001, global longitudinal strain [GLS], p=0.02) but deteriorated in G3 (LVEF, p=0.004, GLS, p=0.03). It did not change in G2. Diastolic function parameters improved significantly only in G3. Changes of LVEF and GLS were also statistically significant between G1 and G3 (LVEF p<0.0001, GLS p=0.004). Patients exhibited a higher survival rate with an LVEF increase >8% than with LVEF deterioration >8% (p=0.04). GLS changes had no significant impact on mortality.
CONCLUSION
In patient with aortic stenosis and LVEF impairment at baseline, TAVI results in an improved LVEF, while patients with a high LVEF at baseline experience a normalization of LVEF after TAVI. Independent of the baseline value, a deterioration of LVEF leads to a significant increase in mortality.
目的
我们的研究旨在通过左心室射血分数(LVEF)和斑点追踪分析评估经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI TF)治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄后的心肌适应性和预后。
方法与结果
在我们机构2010年至2013年间接受TAVI TF的168例患者中,纳入了95例随访期≥3个月的患者,并根据基线左心室射血分数(LVEF;G1:LVEF<40%,G2:40%-55%,G3:>55%)进行分组。使用传统参数和基于斑点追踪的参数评估左心室功能。追踪死亡率直至60个月。TAVI后主动脉瓣口直径和平均主动脉梯度显著改善。左心室尺寸和LVEF基本保持不变。G1组收缩功能显著改善(LVEF,p<0.001,整体纵向应变[GLS],p=0.02),但G3组收缩功能恶化(LVEF,p=0.004,GLS,p=0.03)。G2组收缩功能未改变。仅G3组舒张功能参数显著改善。G1组和G3组之间LVEF和GLS的变化也具有统计学意义(LVEF p<0.0001,GLS p=0.004)。LVEF增加>8%的患者生存率高于LVEF恶化>8%的患者(p=0.04)。GLS变化对死亡率无显著影响。
结论
对于基线时存在主动脉瓣狭窄和LVEF受损的患者,TAVI可改善LVEF,而基线时LVEF较高的患者在TAVI后LVEF恢复正常。与基线值无关,LVEF的恶化会导致死亡率显著增加。