Matsushima Kazuhide, Inaba Kenji, Dollbaum Ryan, Khor Desmond, Jhaveri Vidhi, Jimenez Omar, Strumwasser Aaron, Demetriades Demetrios
Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
J Surg Res. 2016 Dec;206(2):286-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
Although computed tomography (CT) has become the preferred diagnostic modality, immediate surgical intervention is often required for severely injured patients with minimum preoperative radiographic evaluation. The utility of postoperative CT (postop-CT) for the identification of undiagnosed injuries and its impact on patient management remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of postop-CT for the identification of clinically significant injuries in patients who underwent an emergent life-saving procedure.
A 5-y retrospective study from 2009 to 2013 was conducted at a high-volume level I trauma center. We included blunt and penetrating trauma patients who underwent an emergent operation (neck exploration, thoracotomy, and laparotomy) without preoperative CT. Postop-CT was obtained within 48 h after the initial operation at the discretion of the attending trauma surgeon. Characteristics of newly diagnosed injuries on postop-CT were analyzed. These injuries were considered clinically significant when the patient required (1) immediate intervention; (2) new consultation from a specialty service; or (3) a higher level of care.
A total of 89 patients met our inclusion criteria (five neck explorations, 16 thoracotomies, and 74 laparotomies) with the following characteristics: median age of 30 y, 87.6% male, 47.2% penetrating injury, and median injury severity score of 24. New injuries were identified on postop-CT in 59 cases (66%), and clinical management was changed in 51 cases (57%). Patients with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale <15 and solid organ injury identified during the index operation were more likely to have new injuries on postop-CT.
In patients undergoing an emergent operation before having their full diagnostic workup completed, postop-CT often demonstrates clinically significant injuries. Further prospective study to identify the patients who will benefit from postop-CT is warranted.
尽管计算机断层扫描(CT)已成为首选的诊断方式,但对于严重受伤的患者,通常需要在术前进行最少的影像学评估后立即进行手术干预。术后CT(postop-CT)用于识别未诊断出的损伤及其对患者管理的影响仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估术后CT在识别接受紧急救生手术患者中具有临床意义的损伤方面的效用。
在一家大型一级创伤中心进行了一项从2009年至2013年的5年回顾性研究。我们纳入了未经术前CT检查而接受紧急手术(颈部探查、开胸手术和剖腹手术)的钝性和穿透性创伤患者。术后CT由主治创伤外科医生酌情在初次手术后48小时内进行。分析术后CT上新诊断损伤的特征。当患者需要(1)立即干预;(2)由专科服务进行新的会诊;或(3)更高水平的护理时,这些损伤被认为具有临床意义。
共有89例患者符合我们的纳入标准(5例颈部探查、16例开胸手术和74例剖腹手术),具有以下特征:中位年龄30岁,男性占87.6%,穿透伤占47.2%,中位损伤严重程度评分为24分。59例(66%)患者术后CT发现新损伤,51例(57%)患者的临床管理发生改变。入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分<15分且在初次手术中发现实体器官损伤的患者术后CT更有可能出现新损伤。
在完成全面诊断检查之前接受紧急手术的患者中,术后CT常显示具有临床意义的损伤。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究,以确定将从术后CT中获益的患者。