Suppr超能文献

日本用于过敏性鼻炎的补充和替代医学。

Complementary and alternative medicine for allergic rhinitis in Japan.

作者信息

Yonekura Syuji, Okamoto Yoshitaka, Sakurai Daiju, Sakurai Toshioki, Iinuma Tomohisa, Yamamoto Heizaburou, Hanazawa Toyoyuki, Horiguchi Shigetoshi, Kurono Yuichi, Honda Kohei, Majima Yuichi, Masuyama Keisuke, Takeda Noriaki, Fujieda Shigeharu, Okano Mitsuhiro, Ogino Satoshi, Okubo Kimihiro

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Allergol Int. 2017 Jul;66(3):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is extensively used in patients with allergic diseases worldwide. The purpose of this study was to investigate the actual situation of CAM practice in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

We distributed questionnaires to otolaryngologists at 114 facilities in Japan. The subjects who participated in this study included children <16 years of age and adults ≥16 years of age diagnosed with allergic rhinitis by otolaryngologists. The survey was performed in the period from September 2007 to August 2009. Furthermore, we performed the same investigation out of the hospital setting, such as during general health examinations. All questionnaires were returned to Chiba University and analyzed.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients who had ever experimented with CAM in the hospital survey were 7.1% (225/3170) and 19.2% (1416/7363) of children and adults, respectively. Approximately 36.2% of the adult patients thought that the treatments were effective. The main reasons for CAM use were safety, convenience and low price. However, the group who spent more than $1000 on CAM felt more dissatisfaction and anxiety related to treatment at the hospital. The situation of CAM practice was not consistent and was instead influenced by the backgrounds of the subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients who receive CAM report feeling that the effects of treatment provided by hospitals are insufficient and have concerns about the side effects of such treatments. Information regarding standard treatments, as described in the guidelines, should become widely known and diffused, and strong communication with patients should be considered.

摘要

背景

补充和替代医学(CAM)在全球范围内被广泛应用于过敏性疾病患者。本研究的目的是调查补充和替代医学在治疗过敏性鼻炎中的实际应用情况。

方法

我们向日本114家医疗机构的耳鼻喉科医生发放了问卷。参与本研究的受试者包括16岁以下的儿童和经耳鼻喉科医生诊断为过敏性鼻炎的16岁及以上的成年人。调查于2007年9月至2009年8月期间进行。此外,我们在医院环境之外,如在一般健康检查期间进行了同样的调查。所有问卷均返回千叶大学并进行分析。

结果

在医院调查中,曾尝试补充和替代医学的儿童患者比例为7.1%(225/3170),成人患者比例为19.2%(1416/7363)。约36.2%的成年患者认为这些治疗有效。使用补充和替代医学的主要原因是安全性、便利性和价格低廉。然而,在补充和替代医学上花费超过1000美元的患者群体对医院治疗的不满和焦虑情绪更高。补充和替代医学的应用情况并不一致,而是受受试者背景的影响。

结论

许多接受补充和替代医学治疗的患者表示,他们觉得医院提供的治疗效果不足,并对这些治疗的副作用感到担忧。应广泛传播和普及指南中所述的标准治疗信息,并考虑与患者进行深入沟通。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验