Suppr超能文献

[德国门诊环境中的补充和替代医学:提供情况、结构及原因]

[Complementary and alternative medicine in the German outpatient setting: extent, structure and reasons for provision].

作者信息

Thanner Mirjam, Nagel E, Loss J

机构信息

Institut für Medizinmanagement und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth.

Medizinische Soziologie - Institut für Epidemiologie und Präventivmedizin, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2014 Nov;76(11):715-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1364013. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has mainly focused on CAM utilisation by patients. Fewer studies have analysed extent and structure of CAM provision or the reasons why physicians offer CAM as a therapeutic option in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

A standardised questionnaire was developed addressing reasons and patterns of CAM provision. The questionnaire was sent by post to 2,396 general practitioners and specialists in 9 selected German districts. 553 physicians participated in the survey (23%).

RESULTS

63% of the respondents (n=350) answered that they had provided some sort of CAM to their patients within a period of 12 months preceding the study. The most frequently provided methods were acupuncture/traditional Chinese medicine, herbal remedies and homeopathy. In the sample, 90% of the orthopaedists were CAM providers, the highest rate among the participating disciplines. Several reasons for offering CAM were identified: conviction of therapeutic effectiveness regarding the patient's situation (68%), aspects of therapeutic freedom (47%) or less harmful side effects than conventional therapies (34%). 6% provide CAM for monetary reasons.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that the provision of CAM is widespread in the German outpatient setting. However, it has to be taken into account that a selection bias may apply which may lead to an overestimation of CAM provision. Doctors' reasons to offer CAM are manifold; therapeutic reasons seem to outweigh economic motives.

摘要

背景

补充与替代医学(CAM)的研究主要集中在患者对CAM的使用情况。较少有研究分析CAM服务的范围和结构,或医生在门诊环境中将CAM作为治疗选择的原因。

方法

设计了一份标准化问卷,用于调查提供CAM的原因和模式。该问卷通过邮寄方式发送给德国9个选定地区的2396名全科医生和专科医生。553名医生参与了调查(23%)。

结果

63%的受访者(n = 350)回答说,在研究前的12个月内,他们曾为患者提供过某种形式的CAM。最常提供的方法是针灸/中医、草药疗法和顺势疗法。在样本中,90%的骨科医生提供CAM,是参与调查学科中比例最高的。确定了提供CAM的几个原因:相信对患者病情有治疗效果(68%)、治疗自由度方面的原因(47%)或副作用比传统疗法小(34%)。6%的人提供CAM是出于经济原因。

结论

研究结果表明,在德国门诊环境中,CAM的提供很普遍。然而,必须考虑到可能存在选择偏差,这可能导致对CAM提供情况的高估。医生提供CAM的原因是多方面的;治疗原因似乎超过了经济动机。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验