Nuttall Helen E, Kennedy-Higgins Daniel, Devlin Joseph T, Adank Patti
Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK; Department of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PF, UK.
Department of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PF, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
Excitability of articulatory motor cortex is facilitated when listening to speech in challenging conditions. Beyond this, however, we have little knowledge of what listener-specific and speech-specific factors engage articulatory facilitation during speech perception. For example, it is unknown whether speech motor activity is independent or dependent on the form of distortion in the speech signal. It is also unknown if speech motor facilitation is moderated by hearing ability. We investigated these questions in two experiments. We applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the lip area of primary motor cortex (M1) in young, normally hearing participants to test if lip M1 is sensitive to the quality (Experiment 1) or quantity (Experiment 2) of distortion in the speech signal, and if lip M1 facilitation relates to the hearing ability of the listener. Experiment 1 found that lip motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were larger during perception of motor-distorted speech that had been produced using a tongue depressor, and during perception of speech presented in background noise, relative to natural speech in quiet. Experiment 2 did not find evidence of motor system facilitation when speech was presented in noise at signal-to-noise ratios where speech intelligibility was at 50% or 75%, which were significantly less severe noise levels than used in Experiment 1. However, there was a significant interaction between noise condition and hearing ability, which indicated that when speech stimuli were correctly classified at 50%, speech motor facilitation was observed in individuals with better hearing, whereas individuals with relatively worse but still normal hearing showed more activation during perception of clear speech. These findings indicate that the motor system may be sensitive to the quantity, but not quality, of degradation in the speech signal. Data support the notion that motor cortex complements auditory cortex during speech perception, and point to a role for the motor cortex in compensating for differences in hearing ability.
在具有挑战性的条件下听语音时,发音运动皮层的兴奋性会增强。然而,除此之外,我们对在语音感知过程中,哪些听者特异性和语音特异性因素会引发发音促进作用知之甚少。例如,语音运动活动是独立于语音信号中的失真形式,还是依赖于这种失真形式,目前尚不清楚。语音运动促进是否会受到听力的调节也不明确。我们通过两个实验对这些问题进行了研究。我们对年轻的听力正常的参与者的初级运动皮层(M1)唇部区域施加经颅磁刺激(TMS),以测试唇部M1是否对语音信号失真的质量(实验1)或数量(实验2)敏感,以及唇部M1促进作用是否与听者的听力能力相关。实验1发现,与安静环境中的自然语音相比,在感知使用压舌板产生的运动失真语音时,以及在感知背景噪声中的语音时,唇部运动诱发电位(MEP)更大。实验2没有发现在语音清晰度为50%或75%的信噪比下呈现语音时运动系统促进作用的证据,这两种信噪比下的噪声水平明显低于实验1中使用的噪声水平。然而,噪声条件和听力能力之间存在显著的交互作用,这表明当语音刺激的正确分类率为50%时,听力较好的个体中观察到了语音运动促进作用,而听力相对较差但仍正常的个体在感知清晰语音时表现出更多的激活。这些发现表明,运动系统可能对语音信号降级的数量敏感,但对质量不敏感。数据支持了运动皮层在语音感知过程中补充听觉皮层的观点,并指出运动皮层在补偿听力能力差异方面的作用。