Légaré France, Brière Nathalie, Stacey Dawn, Lacroix Guy, Desroches Sophie, Dumont Serge, Fraser Kimberly D, Rivest Louis-Paul, Durand Pierre J, Turcotte Stéphane, Taljaard Monica, Bourassa Henriette, Roy Lise, Painchaud Guérard Geneviève
CHU de Québec Research Centre, Saint-François d'Assise Hospital, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e014023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014023.
The frail elderly in Canada face a tough decision when they start to lose autonomy: whether to stay at home or move to another location. This study seeks to scale up and evaluate the implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) in interprofessional (IP) home care teams caring for elderly clients or their caregivers facing a decision about staying at home or moving elsewhere.
A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial involving 8 Health and Social Service Centers (HSSCs) will be conducted with IP home care teams. HSSCs are the unit of randomisation. A decision guide will be passively distributed to all of the participating HSSCs at the beginning of the project. The participating HSSCs will then be randomised to 1 of 4 intervention start times, separated by 7-month intervals. The primary outcome is whether or not clients and caregivers assumed an active role in decision-making, assessed with a modified version of the Control Preferences Scale. The intervention, targeted at IP home care teams, consists of a 1.5 hour online tutorial and a 3.5 hour skills building workshop in IP SDM. Clients will be eligible for outcome assessment if they (1) are aged ≥65; (2) are receiving care from the IP home care team of the enrolled HSSCs; (3) have made a decision about whether to stay at home or move to another location during the recruitment periods; (4) are able to read, understand and write French or English; (5) can give informed consent. If clients are not able to provide informed consent, their primary caregiver will become the eligible participant.
Ethics committee review approval has been obtained from the Multicenter Ethics Committee of CISSS-Laval. Results will be disseminated at conferences, on websites of team members and in peer-reviewed and professional journals intended for policymakers and managers.
NCT02592525, Pre-results.
加拿大的体弱老年人在开始失去自主能力时面临着一个艰难的决定:是留在家里还是搬到其他地方。本研究旨在扩大并评估跨专业家庭护理团队中共同决策(SDM)的实施情况,这些团队负责照顾面临留在家里还是搬到其他地方决策的老年客户或其护理人员。
将对跨专业家庭护理团队开展一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验,涉及8个健康与社会服务中心(HSSC)。HSSC是随机分组的单位。在项目开始时,将向所有参与的HSSC被动分发一份决策指南。然后,参与的HSSC将被随机分配到4个干预开始时间中的1个,间隔为7个月。主要结局是客户和护理人员是否在决策中发挥积极作用,使用修改版的控制偏好量表进行评估。针对跨专业家庭护理团队的干预包括一个1.5小时的在线教程和一个3.5小时的跨专业共同决策技能培训工作坊。如果客户符合以下条件,将有资格进行结局评估:(1)年龄≥65岁;(2)正在接受所登记HSSC的跨专业家庭护理团队的护理;(3)在招募期间就留在家里还是搬到其他地方做出了决定;(4)能够阅读、理解和书写法语或英语;(5)能够给予知情同意。如果客户无法提供知情同意,其主要护理人员将成为合格参与者。
已获得魁北克省拉瓦尔综合服务与社会安全中心多中心伦理委员会的伦理审查批准。研究结果将在会议上、团队成员的网站上以及面向政策制定者和管理人员的同行评审专业期刊上进行传播。
NCT02592525,预结果。