Suppr超能文献

阿仑单抗治疗活动期复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的生活质量优于皮下注射干扰素β-1a。

Alemtuzumab improves quality-of-life outcomes compared with subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, Spain.

Virginia Mason Hospital & Seattle Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2017 Sep;23(10):1367-1376. doi: 10.1177/1352458516677589. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab was superior on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in phase 3 trials in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE

To examine quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in the alemtuzumab phase 3 trials.

METHODS

Patients who were treatment naive (Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis I [CARE-MS I]) or had an inadequate response to prior therapy (CARE-MS II) received annual courses of alemtuzumab 12 mg/day at baseline (5 days) and Month 12 (3 days) or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a 44 µg three times/week. QoL was measured every 6 or 12 months using Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS), European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and its visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), and 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements from baseline with alemtuzumab were observed on all three QoL instruments at the earliest post-baseline assessment and sustained through Year 2. Statistically significant greater QoL improvements over subcutaneous interferon beta-1a were seen at all time points in CARE-MS II with FAMS, EQ-VAS and SF-36 physical component summary, and in CARE-MS I with FAMS.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with alemtuzumab had improvements in physical, mental, and emotional QoL regardless of treatment history. Improvements were significantly greater with alemtuzumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a on both disease-specific and general measures of QoL.

摘要

背景

在复发缓解型多发性硬化症的 3 期临床试验中,阿仑单抗在临床和磁共振成像(MRI)结果方面优于皮下注射干扰素-β-1a。

目的

检查阿仑单抗 3 期临床试验中的生活质量(QoL)结果。

方法

治疗初治患者(阿仑单抗与干扰素-β-1a 在多发性硬化症中的疗效比较 I 期[CARE-MS I])或先前治疗反应不足的患者(CARE-MS II),在基线(第 5 天)和第 12 个月(第 12 个月,第 3 天)时,每年接受阿仑单抗 12mg/天,或皮下注射干扰素-β-1a 44µg,每周 3 次。使用多发性硬化功能评估量表(FAMS)、欧洲生活质量-5 维度(EQ-5D)及其视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)和 36-项简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)每 6 或 12 个月测量一次 QoL。

结果

从基线开始,阿仑单抗在最早的基线后评估和第 2 年期间,在所有三种 QoL 指标上均有显著改善。在 CARE-MS II 中,阿仑单抗在 FAMS、EQ-VAS 和 SF-36 生理成分综合评分上,以及在 CARE-MS I 中,与皮下注射干扰素-β-1a 相比,在所有时间点均观察到 QoL 的显著改善。

结论

无论治疗史如何,接受阿仑单抗治疗的患者在身体、心理和情绪 QoL 方面均有改善。在疾病特异性和一般性 QoL 测量中,阿仑单抗与皮下注射干扰素-β-1a 相比,改善程度更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验