Visser Laurenske A, Louapre Celine, Uyl-de Groot Carin A, Redekop William K
Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O.Box 1738/ 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
ICM Institut du cerveau et de la moelle epiniere, Sorbonne University, APHP, F-75013, Paris, France.
Arch Public Health. 2021 Mar 20;79(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00561-z.
Inconsistent use of generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies limits cross-country comparability. The objectives: 1) investigate real-world HRQOL of MS patients using both generic and disease-specific HRQOL instruments in the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany and Italy; 2) compare HRQOL among these countries; 3) determine factors associated with HRQOL.
A cross-sectional, observational online web-based survey amongst MS patients was conducted in June-October 2019. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and two HRQOL instruments: the generic EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5L) and disease-related Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54, an extension of the generic Short Form-36 (SF-36) was collected. Health utility scores were calculated using country-specific value sets. Mean differences in HRQOL were analysed and predictors of HRQOL were explored in regression analyses.
In total 182 patients were included (the Netherlands: n = 88; France: n = 58; the United Kingdom: n = 15; Spain: n = 10; living elsewhere: n = 11). Mean MSQOL-54 physical and mental composite scores (42.5, SD:17.2; 58.3, SD:21.5) were lower, whereas the SF-36 physical and mental composite scores (46.8, SD:22.6; 53.1, SD:22.5) were higher than reported in previous clinical trials. The mean EQ-5D utility was 0.65 (SD:0.26). Cross-country differences in HRQOL were found. A common predictor of HRQOL was disability status and primary progressive MS.
The effects of MS on HRQOL in real-world patients may be underestimated. Combined use of generic and disease-specific HRQOL instruments enhance the understanding of the health needs of MS patients. Consequent use of the same instruments in clinical trials and observational studies improves cross-country comparability of HRQOL.
在多发性硬化症(MS)研究中,通用型和疾病特异性健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)工具的使用不一致,限制了跨国可比性。目标:1)在荷兰、法国、英国、西班牙、德国和意大利,使用通用型和疾病特异性HRQOL工具调查MS患者的实际HRQOL;2)比较这些国家之间的HRQOL;3)确定与HRQOL相关的因素。
2019年6月至10月对MS患者进行了一项基于网络的横断面观察性在线调查。收集了患者的人口统计学、临床特征以及两种HRQOL工具:通用型欧洲生活质量量表(EQ-5D-5L)和疾病相关的多发性硬化症生活质量量表(MSQOL)-54,后者是通用型简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)的扩展版本。使用特定国家的价值集计算健康效用得分。分析了HRQOL的平均差异,并在回归分析中探索了HRQOL的预测因素。
共纳入182例患者(荷兰:n = 88;法国:n = 58;英国:n = 15;西班牙:n = 10;居住在其他地方:n = 11)。MSQOL-54的身体和心理综合得分(42.5,标准差:17.2;58.3,标准差:21.5)较低,而SF-36的身体和心理综合得分(46.8,标准差:22.6;53.1,标准差:22.5)高于先前临床试验报告的得分。EQ-5D效用的平均值为0.65(标准差:0.26)。发现了HRQOL的跨国差异。HRQOL的一个共同预测因素是残疾状态和原发进展型MS。
MS对实际患者HRQOL的影响可能被低估。通用型和疾病特异性HRQOL工具的联合使用增强了对MS患者健康需求的理解。在临床试验和观察性研究中随后使用相同的工具可提高HRQOL的跨国可比性。