Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Center for of Experimental Molecular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thromb Res. 2017 Jan;149:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
Severe sepsis is almost invariably associated with systemic activation of coagulation. There is ample evidence that demonstrates a wide-ranging cross-talk between hemostasis and inflammation, which is probably implicated in the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis. Inflammation not only leads to initiation and propagation of coagulation activity, but coagulation also markedly influences inflammation. Molecular mechanisms that play a role in inflammation-induced effects on coagulation have been recognized in much detail. Pro-inflammatory cells and cyto- and chemokines can activate the coagulation system and downregulate crucial physiological anticoagulant mechanisms. Initiation of coagulation activation and consequent thrombin generation is caused by expression of tissue factor on activated monocytes and endothelial cells and is ineffectually offset by tissue factor pathway inhibitor. At the same time, endothelial-associated anticoagulant pathways, in particular the protein C system, is impaired by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Also, fibrin removal is severely obstructed by inactivation of the endogenous fibrinolytic system, mainly as a result of upregulation of its principal inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). Increased fibrin generation and impaired break down lead to deposition of (micro)vascular clots, which may contribute to tissue ischemia and ensuing organ dysfunction. The foundation of the management of coagulation in sepsis is the explicit and thorough treatment of the underlying disorder by antibiotic treatment and source control measures. Adjunctive strategies focused at the impairment of coagulation, including anticoagulants and restoration of physiological anticoagulant mechanisms, may supposedly be indicated and have been found advantageous in experimental and initial clinical trials.
严重脓毒症几乎总是与全身凝血系统的激活有关。有充分的证据表明止血和炎症之间存在广泛的交叉对话,这可能与脓毒症患者器官功能障碍的发病机制有关。炎症不仅导致凝血活性的启动和传播,而且凝血也显著影响炎症。在炎症诱导的凝血作用的分子机制方面已经有了详细的认识。促炎细胞和细胞因子和趋化因子可以激活凝血系统,并下调关键的生理抗凝机制。凝血激活的启动和随后的凝血酶生成是由激活的单核细胞和内皮细胞上组织因子的表达引起的,而组织因子途径抑制剂不能有效地抵消这种作用。与此同时,内皮相关抗凝途径,特别是蛋白 C 系统,被促炎细胞因子损害。此外,由于其主要抑制剂 1 型纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂(PAI-1)的上调,内源性纤维蛋白溶解系统的纤维蛋白清除严重受阻。纤维蛋白生成增加和降解受损导致(微)血管血栓形成,这可能导致组织缺血和随后的器官功能障碍。脓毒症凝血管理的基础是通过抗生素治疗和源控制措施明确和彻底治疗潜在疾病。针对凝血障碍的辅助策略,包括抗凝剂和恢复生理抗凝机制,可能是有意义的,并在实验和初步临床试验中发现是有利的。