Vaphiades Michael S, Roberson Glenn H
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Suite 601, 700 South 18th Street, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue S, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue S, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, JT N420, 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249-6830, USA.
Neurol Clin. 2017 Feb;35(1):101-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.08.009.
When evaluating a patient with an oculomotor cranial nerve palsy it may be unclear which neuroimaging modality is optimal; MRI, MR angiography, computed tomography, computed tomography angiography, or intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. We discuss the clinical guidelines in the evaluation of such patients and review neuroimaging techniques, outlining the advantages and disadvantages of each.
在评估动眼神经麻痹患者时,可能不清楚哪种神经影像学检查方式最为合适;是磁共振成像(MRI)、磁共振血管造影(MRA)、计算机断层扫描(CT)、计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)还是动脉内数字减影血管造影(IADSA)。我们讨论此类患者评估中的临床指南,并回顾神经影像学技术,概述每种技术的优缺点。