Suppr超能文献

诱导化疗反应不足后拒绝喉切除术的结局

Outcomes following laryngectomy refusal after insufficient response to induction chemotherapy.

作者信息

Gorphe Philippe, Matias Margarida, Blanchard Pierre, Even Caroline, Ferte Charles, Tao Yungan, Temam Stéphane, Bidault François, Janot François

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2017 Aug;127(8):1791-1796. doi: 10.1002/lary.26425. Epub 2016 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review patients who refused a total laryngectomy and were treated with radiotherapy (RT) after insufficient response to induction chemotherapy in a larynx preservation protocol for advanced-stage cancer of the larynx and to compare their outcomes with good responders.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by RT were included in the analysis: 75 good responders and 11 insufficient responders who refused surgery. We compared overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival (LEDFS) of the cohort populations in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 44 months. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were respectively 72.2% and 58.8% for OS, 62.8% and 49.4% for DFS, and 59.5% and 44.3% for LEDFS. No survival endpoint was significantly decreased among insufficient responders, contrary to what we expected. When we focused on patients with an initially fixed larynx, the recovery of larynx mobility after induction chemotherapy was not associated with OS (P = 0.6055), DFS (P = 0.459), or LEDFS (P = 0.7403).

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first patient treatment evaluation focused on subjects who refused a total laryngectomy after insufficient response to induction chemotherapy in a larynx preservation protocol for advanced-stage cancer of the larynx. Surprisingly, these patients treated with RT in our cancer center did not experience decreased functional and oncologic outcomes compared to good responders. Further studies will explore the relevance of response criteria and their evaluation methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

  1. Laryngoscope, 127:1791-1796, 2017.
摘要

目的

回顾在晚期喉癌保喉方案中,对诱导化疗反应不佳后拒绝全喉切除术而接受放疗(RT)的患者,并将其结果与反应良好者进行比较。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

86例接受诱导化疗后再行放疗的患者纳入分析:75例反应良好者和11例反应不佳且拒绝手术者。我们在单因素和多因素分析中比较了队列人群的总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和无喉食管功能障碍生存期(LEDFS)。

结果

中位随访时间为44个月。OS的2年和5年生存率分别为72.2%和58.8%,DFS为62.8%和49.4%,LEDFS为59.5%和44.3%。与我们的预期相反,反应不佳者的任何生存终点均未显著降低。当我们关注最初喉部固定的患者时,诱导化疗后喉部活动度的恢复与OS(P = 0.6055)、DFS(P = 0.459)或LEDFS(P = 0.7403)无关。

结论

据我们所知,我们的研究是首个针对晚期喉癌保喉方案中诱导化疗反应不佳后拒绝全喉切除术的患者进行的治疗评估。令人惊讶的是,与反应良好者相比,在我们癌症中心接受放疗的这些患者并未出现功能和肿瘤学结果下降的情况。进一步的研究将探讨反应标准及其评估方法的相关性。

证据级别

4。《喉镜》,2017年,第127卷,第1791 - 1796页。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验