Lee Junghee, Rizzo Shemra, Altshuler Lori, Glahn David C, Miklowitz David J, Sugar Catherine A, Wynn Jonathan K, Green Michael F
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Veterans Affairs Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Department of Biostatistics at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Feb;209:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
Bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SZ) show substantial overlap. It has been suggested that a subgroup of patients might contribute to these overlapping features. This study employed a cross-diagnostic cluster analysis to identify subgroups of individuals with shared cognitive phenotypes.
143 participants (68 BD patients, 39 SZ patients and 36 healthy controls) completed a battery of EEG and performance assessments on perception, nonsocial cognition and social cognition. A K-means cluster analysis was conducted with all participants across diagnostic groups. Clinical symptoms, functional capacity, and functional outcome were assessed in patients.
A two-cluster solution across 3 groups was the most stable. One cluster including 44 BD patients, 31 controls and 5 SZ patients showed better cognition (High cluster) than the other cluster with 24 BD patients, 35 SZ patients and 5 controls (Low cluster). BD patients in the High cluster performed better than BD patients in the Low cluster across cognitive domains. Within each cluster, participants with different clinical diagnoses showed different profiles across cognitive domains.
All patients are in the chronic phase and out of mood episode at the time of assessment and most of the assessment were behavioral measures.
This study identified two clusters with shared cognitive phenotype profiles that were not proxies for clinical diagnoses. The finding of better social cognitive performance of BD patients than SZ patients in the Lowe cluster suggest that relatively preserved social cognition may be important to identify disease process distinct to each disorder.
双相情感障碍(BD)和精神分裂症(SZ)表现出大量重叠。有人提出,一部分患者可能导致了这些重叠特征。本研究采用交叉诊断聚类分析来识别具有共同认知表型的个体亚组。
143名参与者(68名BD患者、39名SZ患者和36名健康对照)完成了一系列脑电图检查以及关于感知、非社会认知和社会认知的表现评估。对所有诊断组的参与者进行了K均值聚类分析。对患者的临床症状、功能能力和功能结局进行了评估。
3组的两聚类解决方案最为稳定。一个聚类包括44名BD患者、31名对照和5名SZ患者,其认知能力(高聚类)比另一个聚类(包括24名BD患者、35名SZ患者和5名对照,低聚类)更好。高聚类中的BD患者在各个认知领域的表现均优于低聚类中的BD患者。在每个聚类中,具有不同临床诊断的参与者在认知领域表现出不同的特征。
所有患者在评估时均处于慢性期且未处于情绪发作期,并且大多数评估都是行为测量。
本研究识别出两个具有共同认知表型特征的聚类,这些特征并非临床诊断的替代指标。低聚类中BD患者的社会认知表现优于SZ患者这一发现表明,相对保留的社会认知对于识别每种疾病独特的疾病过程可能很重要。