Buyukdogan Kadir, Caglar Omur, Isik Samet, Tokgozoglu Mazhar, Atilla Bulent
Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey; Mardin Kiziltepe State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey.
Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey.
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
We assessed factors associated with cut-out after internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures using double lag screw nails.
Retrospective cohort study.
A university hospital.
Patients with non-pathological intertrochanteric femur fractures and a minumum 90days follow-up who underwent internal fixation with dual lag screw nails were included. Potential risk factors for lag screw cut-out investigated by our study were: age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification), type of fracture (AO/OTA classification), fracture stability, side, operation time, implant length, reduction quality, tip-apex distance (TAD), and lag screw configuration. Logistic regression was used to investigate potential predictors of screw cut-out.
Eighty-five of the 118 patients with hip fractures treated between February 2010 and November 2013 at our institution met the inclusion criteria for the study. Fifty-eight patients were female (68.2%), mean age was 77.4 (range: 50-95 years), mean follow up was 380days (range: 150days-2.5 years), and cut of was observed in 9 patients (10.5%). The following variables identified through univariate analysis with p<0.2 were included in multivariant logistic regression model: age, side, reduction quality, implant length, TAD and ASA score. Only TAD (p=0.003) was found to be significant in the multivariant model.
Our study confirmed that risk factors for cut-out with single-lag screw devices are also applicable to dual-lag screw implants. We found that TAD was a significant factor for cut-out in dual-lag screw implants. Thus, screw cut-out can be minimized by optimizing screw position.
我们评估了使用双拉力螺钉治疗股骨近端骨折内固定术后螺钉切出的相关因素。
回顾性队列研究。
一所大学医院。
纳入非病理性股骨转子间骨折且接受双拉力螺钉内固定治疗并至少随访90天的患者。本研究调查的拉力螺钉切出的潜在危险因素包括:年龄、性别、体重指数、合并症(美国麻醉医师协会[ASA]分级)、骨折类型(AO/OTA分类)、骨折稳定性、患侧、手术时间、植入物长度、复位质量、尖顶距(TAD)以及拉力螺钉构型。采用逻辑回归分析来研究螺钉切出的潜在预测因素。
2010年2月至2013年11月在我院接受治疗的118例髋部骨折患者中,85例符合本研究的纳入标准。58例为女性(68.2%),平均年龄77.4岁(范围:50 - 95岁),平均随访时间380天(范围:150天 - 2.5年),9例(10.5%)出现螺钉切出。单因素分析中p<0.2的以下变量被纳入多因素逻辑回归模型:年龄、患侧、复位质量、植入物长度、TAD和ASA评分。多因素模型中仅TAD(p = 0.003)具有统计学意义。
我们的研究证实,单拉力螺钉装置切出的危险因素同样适用于双拉力螺钉植入物。我们发现TAD是双拉力螺钉植入物切出的一个重要因素。因此,通过优化螺钉位置可将螺钉切出降至最低。