School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USA.
Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, St Johns, Auckland, 1072, New Zealand; Institute for Biodiversity, Nußbergerstraße 6a, 93059, Regensburg, Germany.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Feb 1;187:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
National scale initiatives are being attempted in New Zealand (NZ) to meet important environmental goals following land-use intensification over recent decades. Riparian restoration to filter agricultural spillover effects is currently the most widely practised mitigation measure but few studies have investigated the cumulative value of these practices at a national level. We use an applied economic land use model the benefits (GHG emissions, N leaching, P loss, sedimentation and biodiversity gain) and relevant costs (fencing, alternative stock water supplies, restoration planting and opportunity costs) of restoring riparian margins (5-50 m) on all streams in NZ flowing through current primary sector land. Extensive sensitivity analysis reveals that depending on margin width and cost assumptions, riparian margin restoration generates net benefits of between NZ$1.7 billion - $5.2 billion/yr and benefit-cost ratios ranging between 1.4 and 22.4. This suggests that even when not monetising the increase in biodiversity or components of stream ecosystem health and other benefits from planting riparian strips, the benefits to climate and freshwater are significantly greater than the implementation costs of riparian restoration.
新西兰(NZ)正尝试开展国家规模的倡议,以应对近几十年来土地利用集约化带来的重要环境目标。河岸恢复以过滤农业溢出效应是目前应用最广泛的缓解措施,但很少有研究调查这些措施在国家层面上的累积价值。我们使用了一个应用经济土地利用模型,该模型评估了在新西兰所有流经当前初级部门土地的溪流上恢复河岸边缘(5-50 米)的效益(温室气体排放、氮淋失、磷流失、泥沙淤积和生物多样性增益)和相关成本(围栏、替代牲畜水源、恢复种植和机会成本)。广泛的敏感性分析表明,取决于边缘宽度和成本假设,河岸边缘恢复每年产生的净效益在 17 亿至 52 亿新西兰元之间,效益成本比在 1.4 到 22.4 之间。这表明,即使不将生物多样性的增加或溪流生态系统健康的组成部分以及种植河岸带的其他收益货币化,对气候和淡水的效益也大大超过了河岸恢复的实施成本。