Siart Benjamin, Pflüger Lena S, Wallner Bernard
Department of Anthropology, University of ViennaVienna, Austria; Department of Behavioural Biology, University of ViennaVienna, Austria.
Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 11;7:1750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01750. eCollection 2016.
Status within social hierarchies has great effects on the lives of socially organized mammals. Its effects on human behavior and related physiology, however, is relatively little studied. The present study investigated the impact of military rank on fairness and behavior in relation to salivary cortisol (C) and testosterone (T) levels in male soldiers. For this purpose 180 members of the Austrian Armed Forces belonging to two distinct rank groups participated in two variations of a computer-based guard duty allocation experiment. The rank groups were (1) warrant officers (high rank, HR) and (2) enlisted men (low rank, LR). One soldier from each rank group participated in every experiment. At the beginning of the experiment, one participant was assigned to start and the other participant The participant who started could choose if and when to relieve his fellow soldier and therefore had control over the experiment. In order to trigger perception of unfair behavior, an additional experiment was conducted which was manipulated by the experimenter. In the manipulated version both soldiers started in the position and were never relieved, believing that their opponent was , not relieving them. Our aim was to test whether unfair behavior causes a physiological reaction. Saliva samples for hormone analysis were collected at regular intervals throughout the experiment. We found that in the un-manipulated setup high-ranking soldiers spent less time than lower ranking individuals. Rank was a significant predictor for C but not for T levels during the experiment. C levels in the HR group were higher than in the LR group. C levels were also elevated in the manipulated experiment compared to the un-manipulated experiment, especially in LR. We assume that the elevated C levels in HR were caused by HR feeling their status challenged by the situation of having to negotiate with an individual of lower military rank. This would be in line with the observation that unequally shared duty favored HR in most cases. We conclude that social status, in the form of military rank affects fairness behavior in social interaction and endocrine levels.
社会等级制度中的地位对群居哺乳动物的生活有着重大影响。然而,其对人类行为及相关生理机能的影响却相对鲜少被研究。本研究调查了军衔对男性士兵公平感及与唾液皮质醇(C)和睾酮(T)水平相关行为的影响。为此,180名隶属于两个不同军衔组的奥地利武装部队成员参与了基于计算机的警卫任务分配实验的两个变体。军衔组分别为:(1)准尉(高阶,HR)和(2)士兵(低阶,LR)。每个军衔组的一名士兵参与每次实验。实验开始时,一名参与者被指定开始,另一名参与者……开始的参与者可以选择是否以及何时替换其同伴,因此掌控着实验。为了引发对不公平行为的感知,进行了一个由实验者操控的额外实验。在操控版本中,两名士兵都从……位置开始,且从未被替换,他们认为对手是……,没有替换他们。我们的目的是测试不公平行为是否会引起生理反应。在整个实验过程中定期采集唾液样本进行激素分析。我们发现,在未操控的设置中,高阶士兵比低阶个体花费更少的时间……。在实验期间,军衔是C水平的显著预测指标,但不是T水平的预测指标。HR组的C水平高于LR组。与未操控实验相比,在操控实验中C水平也有所升高,尤其是在LR组。我们认为HR组中C水平升高是因为HR感觉他们的地位因不得不与低军衔个体谈判的情况而受到挑战。这与在大多数情况下不平等分担任务对HR有利的观察结果相符。我们得出结论,以军衔形式存在的社会地位会影响社会互动中的公平行为和内分泌水平。