Pettigrew Stacy M, Bell Erin M, Van Zutphen Alissa R, Rocheleau Carissa M, Shaw Gary M, Romitti Paul A, Olshan Andrew, Lupo Philip J, Soim Aida, Makelarski Jennifer A, Michalski Adrian M, Sanderson Wayne
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, New York.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, The University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, New York.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016 Nov;106(11):963-971. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23551.
Because of persistent concerns over the association between pesticides and spina bifida, we examined the role of paternal and combined parental occupational pesticide exposures in spina bifida in offspring using data from a large population-based study of birth defects.
Occupational information from fathers of 291 spina bifida cases and 2745 unaffected live born control infants with estimated dates of delivery from 1997 to 2002 were collected by means of maternal report. Two expert industrial hygienists estimated exposure intensity and frequency to insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for exposure to any pesticide and to any class of pesticide (yes/no; and by median), and exposure to combinations of pesticides (yes/no) and risk of spina bifida. Adjusted odds ratios were also estimated by parent exposed to pesticides (neither, mother only, father only, both parents).
Joint parental occupational pesticide exposure was positively associated with spina bifida (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.4) when compared with infants with neither maternal nor paternal exposures; a similar association was not observed when only one parent was exposed. There was a suggested positive association between combined paternal insecticide and fungicide exposures and spina bifida (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-2.8), however, nearly all other aORs were close to unity.
Overall, there was little evidence paternal occupational pesticide exposure was associated with spina bifida. However, the small numbers make it difficult to precisely evaluate the role of pesticide classes, individually and in combination. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:963-971, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
由于长期以来人们一直关注农药与脊柱裂之间的关联,我们利用一项基于大规模人群的出生缺陷研究数据,探讨了父亲职业性接触农药以及父母双方联合接触农药在后代脊柱裂发病中的作用。
通过母亲报告收集了1997年至2002年期间出生的291例脊柱裂患儿父亲以及2745例未患脊柱裂的活产对照婴儿父亲的职业信息。两名专业工业卫生学家估算了杀虫剂、除草剂和杀菌剂的接触强度和接触频率。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来估算接触任何一种农药、任何一类农药(是/否;按中位数)以及接触多种农药组合(是/否)与脊柱裂风险之间的调整优势比(aOR)及95%置信区间(CI)。还按接触农药的父母(均未接触、仅母亲接触、仅父亲接触、父母双方均接触)估算了调整优势比。
与父母均未接触农药的婴儿相比,父母职业性联合接触农药与脊柱裂呈正相关(aOR为1.5;95%CI为0.9 - 2.4);仅一方父母接触农药时未观察到类似关联。父亲同时接触杀虫剂和杀菌剂与脊柱裂之间存在提示性正相关(aOR为1.5;95%CI为0.8 - 2.8),然而,几乎所有其他aOR均接近1。
总体而言,几乎没有证据表明父亲职业性接触农药与脊柱裂有关。然而,样本量较小使得难以精确评估各类农药单独及联合接触的作用。《出生缺陷研究(A部分)》106:963 - 971,2016年。©2016威利期刊公司。