Cragan Janet D, Isenburg Jennifer L, Parker Samantha E, Alverson C J, Meyer Robert E, Stallings Erin B, Kirby Russell S, Lupo Philip J, Liu Jennifer S, Seagroves Amanda, Ethen Mary K, Cho Sook Ja, Evans MaryAnn, Liberman Rebecca F, Fornoff Jane, Browne Marilyn L, Rutkowski Rachel E, Nance Amy E, Anderka Marlene, Fox Deborah J, Steele Amy, Copeland Glenn, Romitti Paul A, Mai Cara T
Division of Congenital and Developmental Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Carter Consulting Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016 Nov;106(11):972-982. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23587.
Congenital microcephaly has been linked to maternal Zika virus infection. However, ascertaining infants diagnosed with microcephaly can be challenging.
Thirty birth defects surveillance programs provided data on infants diagnosed with microcephaly born 2009 to 2013. The pooled prevalence of microcephaly per 10,000 live births was estimated overall and by maternal/infant characteristics. Variation in prevalence was examined across case finding methods. Nine programs provided data on head circumference and conditions potentially contributing to microcephaly.
The pooled prevalence of microcephaly was 8.7 per 10,000 live births. Median prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was similar among programs using active (6.7) and passive (6.6) methods; the interdecile range of prevalence estimates was wider among programs using passive methods for all race/ethnicity categories except Hispanic. Prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was lowest among non-Hispanic Whites (6.5) and highest among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics (11.2 and 11.9, respectively); estimates followed a U-shaped distribution by maternal age with the highest prevalence among mothers <20 years (11.5) and ≥40 years (13.2). For gestational age and birth weight, the highest prevalence was among infants <32 weeks gestation and infants <1500 gm. Case definitions varied; 41.8% of cases had an HC ≥ the 10 percentile for sex and gestational age.
Differences in methods, population distribution of maternal/infant characteristics, and case definitions for microcephaly can contribute to the wide range of observed prevalence estimates across individual birth defects surveillance programs. Addressing these factors in the setting of Zika virus infection can improve the quality of prevalence estimates. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:972-982, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
先天性小头畸形与孕妇感染寨卡病毒有关。然而,确定被诊断为小头畸形的婴儿可能具有挑战性。
30个出生缺陷监测项目提供了2009年至2013年出生的被诊断为小头畸形婴儿的数据。总体上以及按母婴特征估计了每10000例活产中小头畸形的合并患病率。研究了不同病例发现方法之间患病率的差异。9个项目提供了头围数据以及可能导致小头畸形的情况的数据。
小头畸形的合并患病率为每10000例活产8.7例。使用主动方法(6.7)和被动方法(6.6)的项目中,中位数患病率(每10000例活产)相似;除西班牙裔外,在所有种族/族裔类别中,使用被动方法的项目患病率估计的十分位数间距更大。患病率(每10000例活产)在非西班牙裔白人中最低(6.5),在非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔中最高(分别为11.2和11.9);估计值按母亲年龄呈U形分布,母亲年龄<20岁(11.5)和≥40岁(13.2)的患病率最高。对于孕周和出生体重,患病率最高的是孕周<32周的婴儿和出生体重<1500克的婴儿。病例定义各不相同;41.8%的病例头围≥按性别和孕周划分的第10百分位数。
方法、母婴特征的人群分布以及小头畸形的病例定义差异,可能导致各个出生缺陷监测项目观察到的患病率估计值范围广泛。在寨卡病毒感染背景下解决这些因素可提高患病率估计的质量。《出生缺陷研究(A部分)》106:972 - 982,2016年。©2016威利期刊公司。