Suppr超能文献

遗传和人口统计学表现的地理变异:旧生物地理范式的新见解。

Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm.

机构信息

Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), Box 1005, avenida, Montañana, 50059, Zaragoza, Spain.

UMR 5175 Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS, Box 1019, route de Mende, 34090, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Nov;92(4):1877-1909. doi: 10.1111/brv.12313. Epub 2016 Nov 27.

Abstract

The 'centre-periphery hypothesis' (CPH) is a long-standing postulate in ecology that states that genetic variation and demographic performance of a species decrease from the centre to the edge of its geographic range. This hypothesis is based on an assumed concordance between geographical peripherality and ecological marginality such that environmental conditions become harsher towards the limits of a species range. In this way, the CPH sets the stage for understanding the causes of distribution limits. To date, no study has examined conjointly the consistency of these postulates. In an extensive literature review we discuss the birth and development of the CPH and provide an assessment of the CPH by reviewing 248 empirical studies in the context of three main themes. First, a decrease in species occurrence towards their range limits was observed in 81% of studies, while only 51% demonstrated reduced abundance of individuals. A decline in genetic variation, increased differentiation among populations and higher rates of inbreeding were demonstrated by roughly one in two studies (47, 45 and 48%, respectively). However, demographic rates, size and population performance less often followed CPH expectations (20-30% of studies). We highlight the impact of important methodological, taxonomic, and biogeographical biases on such validation rates. Second, we found that geographic and ecological marginality gradients are not systematically concordant, which casts doubt on the reliability of a main assumption of the CPH. Finally, we attempt to disentangle the relative contribution of geographical, ecological and historical processes on the spatial distribution of genetic and demographic parameters. While ecological marginality gradients explain variation in species' demographic performance better than geographic gradients, contemporary and historical factors may contribute interactively to spatial patterns of genetic variation. We thereby propose a framework that integrates species' ecological niche characteristics together with current and past range structure to investigate spatial patterns of genetic and demographic variation across species ranges.

摘要

“中心-边缘假说”(CPH)是生态学中的一个长期假设,该假说指出,一个物种的遗传变异和种群表现从其地理分布范围的中心向边缘逐渐降低。该假说基于地理边缘性和生态边缘性之间的一致性假设,即环境条件在物种分布范围的边缘变得更加恶劣。通过这种方式,CPH 为理解分布极限的原因奠定了基础。迄今为止,没有研究同时检验这些假设的一致性。在广泛的文献综述中,我们讨论了 CPH 的诞生和发展,并通过在三个主要主题的背景下审查 248 项实证研究,对 CPH 进行了评估。首先,在 81%的研究中观察到物种在其分布范围限制处的出现减少,而只有 51%的研究表明个体数量减少。大约有一半的研究表明遗传变异减少、种群间分化增加和近交率升高(分别为 47%、45%和 48%)。然而,人口增长率、规模和种群表现很少符合 CPH 的预期(约 30%的研究)。我们强调了重要的方法学、分类学和生物地理学偏差对这种验证率的影响。其次,我们发现地理和生态边缘性梯度并不系统地一致,这对 CPH 的一个主要假设的可靠性提出了质疑。最后,我们试图理清地理、生态和历史过程对遗传和人口参数空间分布的相对贡献。虽然生态边缘性梯度比地理梯度更能解释物种人口表现的变化,但当代和历史因素可能会相互作用,影响遗传变异的空间模式。因此,我们提出了一个框架,将物种的生态位特征与当前和过去的范围结构相结合,以研究遗传和人口变异在物种分布范围内的空间模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验