Ittonen Mats, Nielsen Matthew E, Siemers Isabelle, Friberg Magne, Gotthard Karl
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden.
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul;122(26):e2418392122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2418392122. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
Climate change pushes species toward higher latitudes and altitudes, but the proximate drivers of range expansions vary, and it is unclear whether evolution facilitates climate change-induced range changes. In a temporally replicated field experiment, we translocated wall brown butterflies () descending from range interior and range margin populations to sites at 1) the range interior, 2) the range margin, and 3) beyond the current northern range edge. Thereby, we tested for local adaptation in seasonal timing and winter survival and evaluated to what extent local adaptation influences the ongoing, climate-driven range expansion. Almost all individuals from all populations entered diapause at an appropriate time, despite previously identified among-population variation in diapause induction thresholds. Caterpillars of northern descent, however, grew faster than those from southern populations at all field sites. This may be a countergradient adaptation to compensate for the short, northern growing seasons, but we found no evidence for prewinter body mass affecting winter survival. In fact, winter survival was low overall-extremely so at the beyond range site-regardless of population origin, indicating that the primary constraint to range expansion is an inability to adapt to winter conditions. Hence, although range-expanding wall browns show clear local evolution of two traits related to seasonal timing, these putative local adaptations likely do not contribute to range expansion, which is instead limited by winter survival. To predict future range changes, it will be important to distinguish between the traits that evolve during range expansion and those that set the range limit.
气候变化促使物种向更高纬度和海拔迁移,但范围扩张的直接驱动因素各不相同,而且尚不清楚进化是否促进了气候变化引起的范围变化。在一项时间上重复的田间实验中,我们将来自分布区内部和边缘种群的墙褐蝶迁移到以下地点:1)分布区内部,2)分布区边缘,3)当前北部分布边缘以外的地方。由此,我们测试了季节性时间安排和冬季存活率方面的局部适应性,并评估了局部适应性在多大程度上影响了当前由气候驱动的范围扩张。尽管之前已确定不同种群之间滞育诱导阈值存在差异,但几乎所有种群的个体都在适当时间进入滞育。然而,在所有田间地点,来自北方的幼虫比南方种群的幼虫生长得更快。这可能是一种反梯度适应,以弥补北方生长季节较短的问题,但我们没有发现越冬前体重影响冬季存活率的证据。事实上,总体而言冬季存活率很低——在分布范围以外的地点尤其如此——无论种群来源如何,这表明范围扩张的主要限制因素是无法适应冬季条件。因此,尽管正在扩张分布范围的墙褐蝶在与季节性时间安排相关的两个性状上表现出明显的局部进化,但这些假定的局部适应性可能对范围扩张没有贡献,范围扩张反而受到冬季存活率的限制。为了预测未来的范围变化,区分在范围扩张过程中进化的性状和设定范围限制的性状将很重要。