• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年美国急诊科门诊不良药物事件就诊情况
JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2115-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16201.
2
US Emergency Department Visits Attributed to Medication Harms, 2017-2019.美国 2017-2019 年因药物伤害导致的急诊就诊情况。
JAMA. 2021 Oct 5;326(13):1299-1309. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13844.
3
National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations.全国胰岛素相关低血糖及导致急诊就诊和住院的差错的估计数。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):678-86. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.136.
4
National Estimates of Emergency Department Visits for Antibiotic Adverse Events Among Adults-United States, 2011-2015.国家估计成年人因抗生素不良反应而到急诊就诊的情况-美国,2011-2015 年。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1060-1068. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4430-x. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
5
National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events.全国门诊药品不良事件急诊就诊情况监测。
JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1858-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1858.
6
US Emergency Department Visits for Adverse Drug Events From Antibiotics in Children, 2011-2015.美国儿童因抗生素导致药物不良反应而急诊就诊的情况,2011-2015 年。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019 Nov 6;8(5):384-391. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy066.
7
Emergency department visits by adults for psychiatric medication adverse events.成人因精神科药物不良事件前往急诊科就诊的情况。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;71(9):1006-14. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.436.
8
Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults.导致老年人因药物不良事件前往急诊科就诊的用药情况。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Dec 4;147(11):755-65. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-11-200712040-00006.
9
U.S. Emergency Department Visits Resulting From Nonmedical Use of Pharmaceuticals, 2016.美国 2016 年因非医疗目的使用药品而导致的急诊就诊情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 May;56(5):639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
10
Emergency department visits for antibiotic-associated adverse events.因抗生素相关不良事件而到急诊科就诊的情况。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Sep 15;47(6):735-43. doi: 10.1086/591126.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Drug Dose-Specific Adverse Three-Drug Combinations: A US Insurance Claims Data-Based Study.潜在的特定药物剂量的三联药物组合不良事件:一项基于美国保险理赔数据的研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70199. doi: 10.1002/pds.70199.
2
Understanding Medicine Preferences of Older Adults: The Role of Messaging in a Multi-Methods Experimental Survey.了解老年人的医学偏好:多方法实验性调查中信息传递的作用。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70366. doi: 10.1111/hex.70366.
3
Public Health Challenges and Responses to the Growing Ageing Populations.公共卫生挑战与对人口老龄化加剧的应对措施。
Public Health Chall. 2024 Jul 21;3(3):e213. doi: 10.1002/puh2.213. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Safety of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for the treatment of bacterial infection in outpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis with active comparator disproportionality analysis.磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶用于门诊治疗细菌感染的安全性:一项采用活性对照药物不均衡性分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;91(6):1632-1648. doi: 10.1111/bcp.70051.
5
Toxicity analysis of amoxicillin, polyphosphate ester and its complex with amoxicillin on mice.阿莫西林、聚磷酸酯及其与阿莫西林的复合物对小鼠的毒性分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94916-z.
6
Antibiotic Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Nonsevere COVID-19.非重症新冠病毒肺炎住院患者的抗生素治疗
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2511499. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11499.
7
REMS Logic Model: A Pragmatic Framework for Incorporating Drug Safety into Clinical Practice.风险评估与缓解策略逻辑模型:将药物安全性纳入临床实践的实用框架。
Drug Saf. 2025 Jul;48(7):715-718. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01542-9. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
8
Safety of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for the treatment of bacterial infection in outpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis with active comparator disproportionality analysis.磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶用于门诊治疗细菌感染的安全性:一项采用活性对照品不成比例分析的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;91(6):1632-1648. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70051. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
9
Emergency Department Programs to Support Medication Safety in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支持老年人用药安全的急诊科项目:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250814. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0814.
10
Prevalence and risk factors of self-reported adverse drug events in elderly co-morbid patients in northeastern China: a cross-sectional study.中国东北地区老年合并症患者自我报告的药物不良事件的患病率及危险因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05732-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Prevalence and Determinants of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in the United States: 2007 to 2012.美国2007年至2012年潜在不适当处方的患病率及决定因素趋势
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Apr;64(4):788-97. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14077.
2
Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient: A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.老年患者的多重用药:2型糖尿病老年人血糖控制的综述
JAMA. 2016 Mar 8;315(10):1034-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0299.
3
Reimagining Anticoagulation Clinics in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.直接口服抗凝剂时代抗凝门诊的重塑
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Mar;9(2):182-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002366. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
4
Management of Diabetes in Long-term Care and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association.长期护理机构和专业护理机构中糖尿病的管理:美国糖尿病协会立场声明
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):308-18. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2512.
5
Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths--United States, 2000-2014.药物和阿片类药物过量死亡人数增加 - 美国,2000-2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jan 1;64(50-51):1378-82. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3.
6
10. Older Adults.10. 老年人。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S81-5. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S013.
7
Trends in the use of prescription antibiotics: NHANES 1999-2012.1999 - 2012年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中处方抗生素的使用趋势
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jan;71(1):251-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv319. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
8
American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.美国老年医学会2015年更新的《老年人潜在不适当用药的Beers标准》
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov;63(11):2227-46. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13702. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
9
National Trends in Ambulatory Oral Anticoagulant Use.门诊口服抗凝剂使用的全国趋势。
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1300-5.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.044. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Off-Label Prescribing of Antipsychotics in Adults, Children and Elderly Individuals: A Systematic Review of Recent Prescription Trends.成人、儿童和老年人抗精神病药物的超说明书用药:近期处方趋势的系统评价
Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(23):3280-97. doi: 10.2174/1381612821666150619092903.

2013 - 2014年美国急诊科门诊不良药物事件就诊情况

US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014.

作者信息

Shehab Nadine, Lovegrove Maribeth C, Geller Andrew I, Rose Kathleen O, Weidle Nina J, Budnitz Daniel S

机构信息

Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Northrup Grumman Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2115-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16201.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.16201
PMID:27893129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6490178/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 brought attention to adverse drug events in national patient safety efforts. Updated, detailed, nationally representative data describing adverse drug events can help focus these efforts.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the characteristics of emergency department (ED) visits for adverse drug events in the United States in 2013-2014 and describe changes in ED visits for adverse drug events since 2005-2006.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Active, nationally representative, public health surveillance in 58 EDs located in the United States and participating in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project.

EXPOSURES

Drugs implicated in ED visits.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

National weighted estimates of ED visits and subsequent hospitalizations for adverse drug events.

RESULTS

Based on data from 42 585 cases, an estimated 4.0 (95% CI, 3.1-5.0) ED visits for adverse drug events occurred per 1000 individuals annually in 2013 and 2014 and 27.3% (95% CI, 22.2%-32.4%) of ED visits for adverse drug events resulted in hospitalization. An estimated 34.5% (95% CI, 30.3%-38.8%) of ED visits for adverse drug events occurred among adults aged 65 years or older in 2013-2014 compared with an estimated 25.6% (95% CI, 21.1%-30.0%) in 2005-2006; older adults experienced the highest hospitalization rates (43.6%; 95% CI, 36.6%-50.5%). Anticoagulants, antibiotics, and diabetes agents were implicated in an estimated 46.9% (95% CI, 44.2%-49.7%) of ED visits for adverse drug events, which included clinically significant adverse events, such as hemorrhage (anticoagulants), moderate to severe allergic reactions (antibiotics), and hypoglycemia with moderate to severe neurological effects (diabetes agents). Since 2005-2006, the proportions of ED visits for adverse drug events from anticoagulants and diabetes agents have increased, whereas the proportion from antibiotics has decreased. Among children aged 5 years or younger, antibiotics were the most common drug class implicated (56.4%; 95% CI, 51.8%-61.0%). Among children and adolescents aged 6 to 19 years, antibiotics also were the most common drug class implicated (31.8%; 95% CI, 28.7%-34.9%) in ED visits for adverse drug events, followed by antipsychotics (4.5%; 95% CI, 3.3%-5.6%). Among older adults (aged ≥65 years), 3 drug classes (anticoagulants, diabetes agents, and opioid analgesics) were implicated in an estimated 59.9% (95% CI, 56.8%-62.9%) of ED visits for adverse drug events; 4 anticoagulants (warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and enoxaparin) and 5 diabetes agents (insulin and 4 oral agents) were among the 15 most common drugs implicated. Medications to always avoid in older adults according to Beers criteria were implicated in 1.8% (95% CI, 1.5%-2.1%) of ED visits for adverse drug events.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The prevalence of emergency department visits for adverse drug events in the United States was estimated to be 4 per 1000 individuals in 2013 and 2014. The most common drug classes implicated were anticoagulants, antibiotics, diabetes agents, and opioid analgesics.

摘要

重要性

2010年的《患者保护与平价医疗法案》使全国患者安全工作中对药物不良事件的关注有所增加。更新的、详细的、具有全国代表性的数据描述药物不良事件有助于集中这些工作的重点。

目的

描述2013 - 2014年美国因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊特征,并描述自2005 - 2006年以来因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊变化情况。

设计、地点和参与者:在美国58家急诊室进行的具有全国代表性的主动公共卫生监测,这些急诊室参与了国家电子伤害监测系统 - 合作药物不良事件监测项目。

暴露因素

与急诊就诊相关的药物。

主要结局和测量指标

因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊及随后住院的全国加权估计数。

结果

基于42585例病例的数据,2013年和2014年估计每1000人每年有4.0次(95%置信区间,3.1 - 5.0)因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊,且27.3%(95%置信区间,22.2% - 32.4%)因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊会导致住院。2013 - 2014年,估计65岁及以上成年人中34.5%(95%置信区间,30.3% - 38.8%)的急诊就诊是因药物不良事件,而2005 - 2006年这一比例估计为25.6%(95%置信区间,21.1% - 30.0%);老年人的住院率最高(43.6%;95%置信区间,36.6% - 50.5%)。抗凝剂、抗生素和糖尿病药物估计涉及46.9%(95%置信区间,44.2% - 49.7%)的因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊,其中包括具有临床意义的不良事件,如出血(抗凝剂)、中度至重度过敏反应(抗生素)以及伴有中度至重度神经效应的低血糖(糖尿病药物)。自2005 - 2006年以来,因抗凝剂和糖尿病药物导致的药物不良事件急诊就诊比例有所增加,而因抗生素导致的比例有所下降。在5岁及以下儿童中,抗生素是最常见的涉事药物类别(56.4%;95%置信区间,51.8% - 61.0%)。在6至19岁儿童和青少年中,抗生素也是因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊中最常见的涉事药物类别(31.8%;95%置信区间,28.7% - 34.9%),其次是抗精神病药物(4.5%;95%置信区间:3.3% - 5.6%)。在老年人(年龄≥65岁)中,3类药物(抗凝剂、糖尿病药物和阿片类镇痛药)估计涉及59.9%(95%置信区间,56.8% - 62.9%)的因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊;15种最常见的涉事药物中有4种抗凝剂(华法林、利伐沙班、达比加群和依诺肝素)和5种糖尿病药物(胰岛素和4种口服药物)。根据Beers标准应在老年人中始终避免使用的药物涉及1.8%(95%置信区间,1.5% - 2.1%)的因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊。

结论与意义

2013年和2014年美国因药物不良事件导致的急诊就诊患病率估计为每1000人中有4次。最常见的涉事药物类别是抗凝剂、抗生素、糖尿病药物和阿片类镇痛药。