Psychol Assess. 2017 Nov;29(11):1412. doi: 10.1037/pas0000424. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
Reports an error in "Profiling pathological narcissism according to DSM-5 domains and traits: A study on consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients" by Andrea Fossati, Antonella Somma, Serena Borroni, Aaron L. Pincus, Kristian E. Markon and Robert F. Krueger (, Advanced Online Publication, Jun 23, 2016, np). In the article, several values were reversed and the mean was misreported in Table 2. The corrected table is present in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-31181-001.) Pathological narcissism represents a clinically relevant, albeit controversial personality construct, with multiple conceptualizations that are operationalized by different measures. Even in the recently published Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5), 2 different views of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) are formulated (i.e., Section II and Section III). The DSM-5 Section III alternative PD model diagnosis of NPD is based on self and interpersonal dysfunction (Criterion A) and a profile of maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B), specifically elevated scores on Attention Seeking and Grandiosity. Given the diversity of conceptualizations of pathological narcissism, we evaluated the convergences and divergences in DSM-5 trait profiles characterizing multiple measures of narcissism in a clinical sample of 278 consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients. Patients were administered the Italian versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and 4 measures of NPD, (a) the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI); (b) the NPD scale of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+; (c) the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis II Personality Disorders, Version 2.0 (SCID-II) as an observer-rated measure of NPD; and (d) the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI). Multiple regression analyses showed that PID-5 traits explained from 13% to more than 60% of the variance in the different NPD measures. Attention Seeking was consistently associated with all measures of NPD, whereas Grandiosity was associated with some of the NPD measures. All measures of NPD were also significantly related to additional DSM-5 maladaptive traits. (PsycINFO Database Record
报告了安德烈亚·福萨蒂(Andrea Fossati)、安东尼拉·索马(Antonella Somma)、塞雷娜·博洛尼(Serena Borroni)、艾伦·L·平卡斯(Aaron L. Pincus)、克里斯蒂安·E·马克恩(Kristian E. Markon)和罗伯特·F·克鲁格(Robert F. Krueger)在《根据 DSM-5 领域和特征对病理性自恋进行分析:对连续入院的意大利心理治疗患者的研究》(,在线预发表,2016 年 6 月 23 日,np)中的错误。在文章中,多个值被反转,表 2 中的平均值被误报。更正后的表格在勘误表中。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录 2016-31181-001 中。)病理性自恋是一种具有临床相关性的人格结构,尽管存在争议,但具有多种概念化,这些概念化通过不同的测量来实现。即使在最近发布的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册-第五版》(DSM-5)中,也提出了自恋型人格障碍(NPD)的两种不同观点(即第 II 节和第 III 节)。DSM-5 第 III 节替代 PD 模型对 NPD 的诊断基于自我和人际功能障碍(标准 A)和适应不良人格特征的特征(标准 B),特别是寻求关注和自大的分数升高。鉴于病理性自恋的概念化存在多样性,我们评估了 278 名连续入院的意大利心理治疗患者中,DSM-5 特征谱中多种自恋测量的特征的趋同和分歧。患者接受了意大利语版本的 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)和 4 种 NPD 测量,(a)自恋人格量表(NPI);(b)人格诊断问卷-4+的 NPD 量表;(c)轴 II 人格障碍的结构化临床访谈,版本 2.0(SCID-II)作为 NPD 的观察者评定量表;和(d)病理性自恋量表(PNI)。多元回归分析表明,PID-5 特征解释了不同 NPD 测量的 13%至 60%以上的方差。寻求关注与所有 NPD 测量均相关,而自大与一些 NPD 测量相关。所有 NPD 测量也与 DSM-5 其他适应不良特征显著相关。(PsycINFO 数据库记录