Miller Joshua D, Lynam Donald R, Campbell W Keith
University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, GA, USA
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Assessment. 2016 Feb;23(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191114522909. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
There exists substantial debate about how to best assess pathological narcissism with a variety of measures designed to assess grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, as well as the DSM-IV and DSM-5 based conceptualizations of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Wright and colleagues published correlations between several narcissism measures (Narcissistic Personality Inventory [NPI]; Pathological Narcissism Inventory [PNI]; Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire [PDQ] NPD) with the traits comprising the DSM-5 Section III personality trait model. In the current study, we examine the agreement manifested by Wright and colleagues' narcissism-DSM-5 trait profiles with expert ratings of the DSM-5 traits most relevant to descriptions of DSM-IV NPD. Despite concerns regarding the NPI's ability to measure pathological narcissism, its trait profile was strongly correlated with expert ratings, as was PDQ NPD's profile. Conversely, the trait profiles associated with the PNI were primarily uncorrelated with the expert rated NPD profile. The implications of these findings with regard to the assessment of narcissism are discussed.
对于如何使用旨在评估夸大型和脆弱型自恋以及基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)和第五版(DSM-5)的自恋型人格障碍(NPD)概念化的各种测量方法来最佳评估病理性自恋,存在大量争议。赖特及其同事发表了几种自恋测量方法(自恋型人格问卷[NPI];病理性自恋问卷[PNI];人格诊断问卷[PDQ] NPD)与构成DSM-5第三部分人格特质模型的特质之间的相关性。在当前研究中,我们考察了赖特及其同事的自恋-DSM-5特质概况与DSM-5中与DSM-IV NPD描述最相关的特质的专家评级所表现出的一致性。尽管有人担心NPI测量病理性自恋的能力,但其特质概况与专家评级高度相关,PDQ NPD的概况也是如此。相反,与PNI相关的特质概况主要与专家评级的NPD概况不相关。本文讨论了这些发现对自恋评估的意义。