Guérin Claude, Papazian Laurent, Reignier Jean, Ayzac Louis, Loundou Anderson, Forel Jean-Marie
Réanimation Médicale Groupement Hospitalier Nord Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Université de Lyon, 1 69100, Villeurbanne, France.
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 29;20(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1556-2.
Driving pressure (ΔPrs) across the respiratory system is suggested as the strongest predictor of hospital mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We wonder whether this result is related to the range of tidal volume (V). Therefore, we investigated ΔPrs in two trials in which strict lung-protective mechanical ventilation was applied in ARDS. Our working hypothesis was that ΔPrs is a risk factor for mortality just like compliance (Crs) or plateau pressure (Pplat,rs) of the respiratory system.
We performed secondary analysis of data from 787 ARDS patients enrolled in two independent randomized controlled trials evaluating distinct adjunctive techniques while they were ventilated as in the low V arm of the ARDSnet trial. For this study, we used V, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pplat,rs, Crs, ΔPrs, and respiratory rate recorded 24 hours after randomization, and compared them between survivors and nonsurvivors at day 90. Patients were followed for 90 days after inclusion. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used for mortality at day 90. If colinearity between ΔPrs, Crs, and Pplat,rs was verified, specific Cox models were used for each of them.
Both trials enrolled 805 patients of whom 787 had day-1 data available, and 533 of these survived. In the univariate analysis, ΔPrs averaged 13.7 ± 3.7 and 12.8 ± 3.7 cmHO (P = 0.002) in nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively. Colinearity between ΔPrs, Crs and Pplat,rs, which was expected as these variables are mathematically coupled, was statistically significant. Hazard ratios from the Cox models for day-90 mortality were 1.05 (1.02-1.08) (P = 0.005), 1.05 (1.01-1.08) (P = 0.008) and 0.985 (0.972-0.985) (P = 0.029) for ΔPrs, Pplat,rs and Crs, respectively. PEEP and V were not associated with death in any model.
When ventilating patients with low V, ΔPrs is a risk factor for death in ARDS patients, as is Pplat,rs or Crs. As our data originated from trials from which most ARDS patients were excluded due to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, these findings must be validated in independent observational studies in patients ventilated with a lung protective strategy.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00299650 . Registered 6 March 2006 for the Acurasys trial. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00527813 . Registered 10 September 2007 for the Proseva trial.
跨呼吸系统的驱动压(ΔPrs)被认为是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者院内死亡率的最强预测指标。我们想知道这一结果是否与潮气量(V)的范围有关。因此,我们在两项对ARDS患者应用严格肺保护性机械通气的试验中研究了ΔPrs。我们的工作假设是,ΔPrs与呼吸系统的顺应性(Crs)或平台压(Pplat,rs)一样,是死亡率的危险因素。
我们对787例ARDS患者的数据进行了二次分析,这些患者参与了两项独立的随机对照试验,评估不同的辅助技术,同时他们按照ARDSnet试验低V组的通气方式进行通气。在本研究中,我们使用随机分组后24小时记录的V、呼气末正压(PEEP)、Pplat,rs、Crs、ΔPrs和呼吸频率,并在第90天比较幸存者和非幸存者之间的这些指标。患者纳入后随访90天。采用Cox比例风险模型分析第90天的死亡率。如果验证了ΔPrs、Crs和Pplat,rs之间的共线性,则对它们分别使用特定的Cox模型。
两项试验共纳入805例患者,其中787例有第1天的数据,其中533例存活。在单因素分析中,非幸存者和幸存者的ΔPrs平均分别为13.7±3.7和12.8±3.7 cmH₂O(P = 0.002)。由于这些变量在数学上相互关联,因此预期的ΔPrs、Crs和Pplat,rs之间的共线性具有统计学意义。第90天死亡率的Cox模型风险比,ΔPrs为1.05(1.02 - 1.08)(P = 0.005),Pplat,rs为1.05(1.01 - 1.08)(P = 0.008),Crs为0.985(0.972 - 0.985)(P = 0.