Suppr超能文献

[不同跨肺压指导下的机械通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼吸及血流动力学的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验]

[Effect of different transpulmonary pressures guided mechanical ventilation on respiratory and hemodynamics of patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized controlled trial].

作者信息

Li Jianqiu, Luo Zhihui, Li Xiaolei, Huang Zhongyi, Han Jie, Li Zifeng, Zhou Zhaoxiong, Chen Houwang

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital of South Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, Guangdong, China (Li JQ, Luo ZH, Li XL, Huang ZY, Han J, Li ZF, Zhou ZX); Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen Shajing Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Shenzhen 518104, Guangdong, China (Li JQ, Chen HW). Corresponding author: Li Jianqiu, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Jan;29(1):39-44. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.01.009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of different transpulmonary pressures (Ptp) guided mechanical ventilation (MV) on respiratory function and hemodynamics parameters of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and to find out a more optimized Ptp.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. The ventilated patients with ARDS admitted to Department of Critical Care Medicine (ICU) of Shenzhen Shajing Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (EICU) of Shenzhen Hospital of South Medical University from February 2013 to August 2016 were enrolled. According to random number table method, all patients were divided into control group and observation group. The patients in observation group was subdivided into three subgroups according to the different setting of Ptp, namely Ptp 10, 15, 20 cmHO (1 cmHO = 0.098 kPa) subgroups. The patients in all groups received standard treatment in accordance with the international guidelines for ARDS. The patients in control group were ventilated by guidance of ARDSNet, and the patients in observation group were ventilated by guidance of different Ptp. After setting different Ptp at 1, 24, 48 hours in the process of MV, respiratory function parameters of patients in all groups were determined. The hemodynamic parameters were determined by using pulse indicating continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) technology. The duration of MV, length of ICU stay and 28-day mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients with ARDS were enrolled, among whom 2 patients died within 48 hours, and 1 case was lost to follow-up. Finally, 64 patients completed the study, 43 patients in observation group, and 21 in control group. There were no significant differences in gender composition, age, oxygenation index (PaO/FiO) within 4 hours after hospital admission and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score between the two groups, which showed the baseline was equivalent and comparable. The respiratory function and hemodynamic parameters showed no obvious change in control group at different time points of MV; but with the extension of ventilation, the respiratory function was improved significantly in observation group, and the gradually rising of Ptp had obvious adverse effects on hemodynamics parameters. Compared with control group, at 48 hours of ventilation after setting Ptp, the respiratory function in Ptp 20 cmHO subgroup was improved significantly, PaO/FiO, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), airway platform pressure (Pplat), and lung compliance (Cst) were significantly increased [PaO/FiO (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 220.9±30.8 vs. 178.5±42.9, PaCO (mmHg): 55.1±7.6 vs. 38.6±4.8, PEEP (cmHO): 24.7±4.8 vs. 6.6±2.2, Pplat (cmHO): 34.4±3.7 vs. 20.7±3.5, Cst (mL/cmHO): 23.8±3.6 vs. 13.1±4.6; all P < 0.05], and extravascular lung water index (ELWI) was significantly decreased (mL/kg: 6.8±1.7 vs. 10.8±2.6, P < 0.05), but mean artery pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) such as hemodynamics parameters were also significantly reduced [MAP (mmHg): 58.8±6.7 vs. 69.7±4.7, CI (mL×s×m): 46.7±23.3 vs. 73.3±30.0, GEDVI (mL/m): 633.2±45.2 vs. 702.6±55.7; all P < 0.05]; the PaO/FiO, PEEP, Pplat, and Cst in Ptp 10 cmHO subgroup were significantly increased [PaO/FiO (mmHg): 183.4±45.5 vs. 178.5±42.9, PEEP (cmHO): 14.4±3.6 vs. 6.6±2.2, Pplat (cmHO): 25.7±5.6 vs. 20.7±3.5, Cst (mL/cmHO): 16.2±4.3 vs. 13.1±4.6; all P < 0.05], and ELWI was significantly reduced (mL/kg: 8.7±1.8 vs. 10.8±2.6, P < 0.05), but the MAP, CI and GEDVI showed no significant difference [MAP (mmHg): 65.8±4.6 vs. 69.7±4.7, CI (mL×s×m): 65.0±35.0 vs. 73.3±30.0, GEDVI (mL/m): 706.7±54.4 vs. 702.6±55.7; all P > 0.05]. The above illustrated that 10 cmHO Ptp could act as the same as 20 cmHO did to improve oxygenation and respiratory function, but had no obvious effect on hemodynamics. Compared with control group, the duration of MV and the length of ICU stay showed no significant differences in Ptp 10 cmHO and 15 cmHO subgroups, but those in 20 cmHO subgroup were significantly shortened [duration of MV (days): 95.5±21.5 vs. 130.8±23.6, length of ICU stay (days): 8.1±2.2 vs. 12.8±2.8, both P > 0.05]. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MV guided by Ptp of 10 cmHO could improve oxygenation and respiratory mechanics, while has less hemodynamic influence. It was a safe and effective cardiopulmonary protection ventilation method.

摘要

目的

评估不同跨肺压(Ptp)指导下的机械通气(MV)对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者呼吸功能及血流动力学参数的影响,探寻更优化的Ptp。

方法

进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)。选取2013年2月至2016年8月在广州医科大学附属深圳沙井医院重症医学科(ICU)及南方医科大学深圳医院急诊与重症医学科(EICU)收治的ARDS机械通气患者。根据随机数字表法,将所有患者分为对照组和观察组。观察组患者根据不同Ptp设置再分为三个亚组,即Ptp 10、15、20 cmH₂O(1 cmH₂O = 0.098 kPa)亚组。所有组患者均按照ARDS国际指南接受标准治疗。对照组患者在ARDSNet指导下通气,观察组患者在不同Ptp指导下通气。在MV过程中于1、24、48小时设置不同Ptp后,测定所有组患者的呼吸功能参数。采用脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)技术测定血流动力学参数。记录MV持续时间、ICU住院时间及28天死亡率。

结果

共纳入67例ARDS患者,其中2例在48小时内死亡,1例失访。最终,64例患者完成研究,观察组43例,对照组21例。两组在性别构成、年龄、入院后4小时内氧合指数(PaO₂/FiO₂)及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)方面无显著差异,表明基线具有可比性。MV不同时间点对照组呼吸功能及血流动力学参数无明显变化;但随着通气时间延长,观察组呼吸功能显著改善,且Ptp逐渐升高对血流动力学参数有明显不良影响。与对照组相比,设置Ptp通气48小时后,Ptp 20 cmH₂O亚组呼吸功能显著改善,PaO₂/FiO₂、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)、呼气末正压(PEEP)、气道平台压(Pplat)及肺顺应性(Cst)均显著升高[PaO₂/FiO₂(mmHg,1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):220.9±30.8 vs. 178.5±42.9,PaCO₂(mmHg):55.1±7.6 vs. 38.6±4.8,PEEP(cmH₂O):24.7±4.8 vs. 6.6±2.2,Pplat(cmH₂O):34.4±3.7 vs. 20.7±3.5,Cst(mL/cmH₂O):23.8±3.6 vs. 13.1±4.6;均P < 0.05],血管外肺水指数(ELWI)显著降低(mL/kg:6.8±1.7 vs. 10.8±2.6,P < 0.05),但平均动脉压(MAP)、心脏指数(CI)、全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDVI)等血流动力学参数也显著降低[MAP(mmHg):58.8±6.7 vs. 69.7±4.7,CI(mL·s⁻¹·m⁻²):46.7±23.3 vs. 73.3±30.0,GEDVI(mL/m²):633.2±45.2 vs. 702.6±55.7;均P < 0.05];Ptp 10 cmH₂O亚组的PaO₂/FiO₂、PEEP、Pplat及Cst显著升高[PaO₂/FiO₂(mmHg):183.4±45.5 vs. 178.5±42.9,PEEP(cmH₂O):14.4±3.6 vs. 6.6±2.2,Pplat(cmH₂O):25.7±5.6 vs. 20.7±3.5,Cst(mL/cmH₂O):16.2±4.3 vs. 13.1±4.6;均P < 0.05],ELWI显著降低(mL/kg:8.7±1.8 vs. 10.8±2.6,P < 0.05),但MAP、CI及GEDVI无显著差异[MAP(mmHg):65.8±4.6 vs. 69.7±4.7,CI(mL·s⁻¹·m⁻²):65.0±35.0 vs. 73.3±30.0,GEDVI(mL/m²):706.7±54.4 vs. 702.6±55.7;均P > 0.05]。上述结果表明,10 cmH₂O的Ptp在改善氧合及呼吸功能方面与20 cmH₂O相当,但对血流动力学无明显影响。与对照组相比,Ptp 10 cmH₂O和15 cmH₂O亚组的MV持续时间及ICU住院时间无显著差异,但20 cmH₂O亚组显著缩短[MV持续时间(天):95.5±21.5 vs. 130.8±23.6,ICU住院时间(天):8.1±2.2 vs. 12.8±2.8,均P > 0.05]。各组28天死亡率无显著差异。

结论

10 cmH₂O的Ptp指导下的MV可改善氧合及呼吸力学,对血流动力学影响较小。是一种安全有效的心肺保护通气方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验