Suppr超能文献

接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者的治疗相关死亡:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Treatment-related Death in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Abdel-Rahman O, Helbling D, Schmidt J, Petrausch U, Giryes A, Mehrabi A, Schöb O, Mannhart M, Oweira H

机构信息

Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ), Zurich, Switzerland.

OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ), Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Apr;29(4):218-230. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

Abstract

AIMS

We carried out a meta-analysis to determine the risk of treatment-related death associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor use in cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined data from the Medline and Google Scholar databases. We also examined original studies and review articles for cross-references. Eligible studies included randomised phase II and phase III trials of patients with cancer treated with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab; nivolumab; tremelimumab and atezolizumab. The authors extracted relevant information on participants, characteristics, treatment-related death and information on the methodology of the studies.

RESULTS

After exclusion of ineligible records, 18 clinical trials were included in the analysis. The odds ratio for treatment-related death for CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) was 1.80 (95% confidence interval 1.25, 2.59; P=0.002) and for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab) was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.31, 1.30; P=0.22). Treated cancer seems to have no effect on the risk of treatment-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of our data showed that CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) in a higher dose (10 mg/kg) seem to be associated with a higher risk of treatment-related death compared with control regimens, whereas PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab) do not cause the same risk. Clinicians have to be fully aware of these differential risks and council their patients appropriately.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定癌症患者使用免疫检查点抑制剂相关的治疗相关死亡风险。

材料与方法

我们检索了Medline和谷歌学术数据库中的数据。我们还查阅了原始研究和综述文章以获取交叉引用信息。符合条件的研究包括使用伊匹单抗、帕博利珠单抗、纳武单抗、曲美木单抗和阿特珠单抗治疗癌症患者的随机II期和III期试验。作者提取了关于参与者、特征、治疗相关死亡以及研究方法的相关信息。

结果

在排除不符合条件的记录后,18项临床试验纳入分析。CTLA-4抑制剂(伊匹单抗和曲美木单抗)治疗相关死亡的比值比为1.80(95%置信区间1.25, 2.59;P = 0.002),PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(纳武单抗、帕博利珠单抗和阿特珠单抗)为0.63(95%置信区间0.31, 1.30;P = 0.22)。所治疗的癌症似乎对治疗相关死亡风险没有影响。

结论

我们的数据分析表明,与对照方案相比,高剂量(10mg/kg)的CTLA-4抑制剂(伊匹单抗和曲美木单抗)似乎与更高的治疗相关死亡风险相关,而PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(纳武单抗、帕博利珠单抗和阿特珠单抗)不会导致相同风险。临床医生必须充分意识到这些不同的风险,并适当地向患者提供建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验