Zech N, Hansen E, Bernardy K, Häuser W
Department of Anaesthesiology, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Germany.
Department Pain Therapy, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Eur J Pain. 2017 Feb;21(2):217-227. doi: 10.1002/ejp.933. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
This systematic review aimed at evaluating the efficacy, acceptability and safety of guided imagery/hypnosis (GI/H) in fibromyalgia. Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and SCOPUS were screened through February 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GI/H with controls were analysed. Primary outcomes were ≥50% pain relief, ≥20% improvement of health-related quality of life, psychological distress, disability, acceptability and safety at end of therapy and 3-month follow-up. Effects were summarized by a random effects model using risk differences (RD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Seven RCTs with 387 subjects were included into a comparison of GI/H versus controls. There was a clinically relevant benefit of GI/H compared to controls on ≥50% pain relief [RD 0.18 (95% CI 0.02, 0.35)] and psychological distress [SMD -0.40 (95% CI -0.70, -0.11)] at the end of therapy. Acceptability at the end of treatment for GI/H was not significantly different to the control. Two RCTs with 95 subjects were included in the comparison of hypnosis combined with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) versus CBT alone. Combined therapy was superior to CBT alone in reducing psychological distress at the end of therapy [SMD -0.50 (95% CI -0.91, -0.09)]. There were no statistically significant differences between combined therapy and CBT alone in other primary outcomes at the end of treatment and follow-up. No study reported on safety. GI/H hold promise in a multicomponent management of fibromyalgia.
We provide a systematic review with meta-analysis on guided imagery and hypnosis for fibromyalgia. Current analyses endorse the efficacy and tolerability of guided imagery/hypnosis and of the combination of hypnosis with cognitive-behavioural therapy in reducing key symptoms of fibromyalgia.
本系统评价旨在评估引导式意象/催眠(GI/H)在纤维肌痛中的疗效、可接受性和安全性。截至2016年2月,对Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和SCOPUS进行了筛选。分析了比较GI/H与对照组的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为治疗结束时和3个月随访时疼痛缓解≥50%、健康相关生活质量改善≥20%、心理困扰、残疾、可接受性和安全性。采用随机效应模型,使用风险差异(RD)或标准化均数差异(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)总结效应。七项包含387名受试者的RCT纳入GI/H与对照组的比较。与对照组相比,GI/H在治疗结束时在疼痛缓解≥50%[RD 0.18(95%CI 0.02,0.35)]和心理困扰[SMD -0.40(95%CI -0.70,-0.11)]方面具有临床相关益处。GI/H治疗结束时的可接受性与对照组无显著差异。两项包含95名受试者的RCT纳入催眠联合认知行为疗法(CBT)与单纯CBT的比较。联合疗法在治疗结束时减轻心理困扰方面优于单纯CBT[SMD -0.50(95%CI -0.91,-0.09)]。治疗结束时和随访时,联合疗法与单纯CBT在其他主要结局方面无统计学显著差异。没有研究报告安全性。GI/H在纤维肌痛的多组分管理中具有前景。
我们提供了一项关于纤维肌痛的引导式意象和催眠的系统评价及荟萃分析。当前分析支持引导式意象/催眠以及催眠与认知行为疗法联合在减轻纤维肌痛关键症状方面的疗效和耐受性。