Korhonen T, Penttonen M
Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Behav Brain Res. 1989 Sep 1;34(3):179-97. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80101-9.
A differentiation of short-latency (alpha) and long-latency (delayed) classically conditioned behavioral and evoked neural (hippocampal) responses was attempted. Further, facilitation and retardation of these responses were studied in an experimental design in which 10 paired conditioning sessions either preceded (CC-CO group) or followed (CO-CC group) 10 randomly unpaired presentations of conditioned stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimuli (UCS). A 2024-ms tone (1000 Hz) was delivered directly through a miniature earphone to the left ear, eliciting an orienting head movement ('alpha' response) to the left. The unconditioned stimulus (UCS) was a direct 1024-ms stimulation of the lateral hypothalamic area overlapping the CS (delayed paradigm) so that both stimuli terminated simultaneously. The UCS elicited approach behavior and a specific head movement in each animal. The latency and the direction of the head movement were used as criteria for a differentiation of the short-latency and long-latency conditioned responses (CR). All cats showed conditioned short-latency responses. Pairing specific long-latency head movements were observed in 10 of 13 cats and 6 of them showed a long-latency CR which was a head movement to the right, while the short-latency CR on the same trials was a head movement to the left. Hippocampal (subiculum, dentate fascia and CA1) evoked responses also showed pairing specific CRs appearing as increased negativity (short-latency CR), or increased positivity (long-latency CR). Additional reversed stimulus order (backward) sessions supported an assumption of the different nature of the short-latency and long-latency CRs: the long-latency CRs showed extinction while the short-latency CRs remained. The unpaired pre-exposure to the CSs and UCSs in the CO-CC group resulted in the retarded acquisition of the behavioral responses during the subsequent paired sessions.
尝试区分经典条件反射行为和诱发神经(海马体)反应中的短潜伏期(α)和长潜伏期(延迟)反应。此外,在一个实验设计中研究了这些反应的促进和延迟情况,在该设计中,10次配对条件训练 session 要么在10次随机非配对呈现的条件刺激(CS)和非条件刺激(UCS)之前(CC - CO组),要么在之后(CO - CC组)。一个2024毫秒的音调(1000赫兹)通过一个微型耳机直接传递到左耳,引发向左的定向头部运动(“α”反应)。非条件刺激(UCS)是对与CS重叠的外侧下丘脑区域进行直接的1024毫秒刺激(延迟范式),以便两种刺激同时终止。UCS在每只动物中引发接近行为和特定的头部运动。头部运动的潜伏期和方向被用作区分短潜伏期和长潜伏期条件反应(CR)的标准。所有猫都表现出条件短潜伏期反应。在13只猫中的10只观察到了配对的特定长潜伏期头部运动,其中6只表现出长潜伏期CR,即头部向右运动,而在相同试验中的短潜伏期CR是头部向左运动。海马体(下托、齿状筋膜和CA1)诱发反应也显示出配对特定的CR,表现为负性增加(短潜伏期CR)或正性增加(长潜伏期CR)。额外的反向刺激顺序(向后)session支持了短潜伏期和长潜伏期CR具有不同性质的假设:长潜伏期CR表现出消退,而短潜伏期CR仍然存在。CO - CC组中对CS和UCS的非配对预暴露导致在随后的配对session期间行为反应的习得延迟。