• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

75岁以上患者心脏再同步治疗的并发症及1年获益——来自德国器械注册研究的见解

Complications and 1-year benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients over 75 years of age - Insights from the German Device Registry.

作者信息

Köbe Julia, Andresen Dietrich, Maier Sebastian, Stellbrink Christoph, Kleemann Thomas, Gonska Bernd-Dieter, Reif Sebastian, Hochadel Matthias, Senges Jochen, Eckardt Lars

机构信息

Division of Electrophysiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:784-789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.212. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.212
PMID:27898337
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evidence on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in older patients is scarce and conflicting. Nevertheless, CRT in the elderly is of major practical relevance as heart failure prevalence increases with age.

METHODS

The German Device Registry (DEVICE) is a nationwide, prospective registry with a longitudinal follow-up design investigating device implantations in 60 German centres. The present analysis of DEVICE focussed on perioperative complication rates and 1-year outcome of patients ≥75years (n=320) compared to younger patients (n=879) receiving a CRT device.

RESULTS

Comorbidities were more common in older patients (chronic kidney disease (CKD): 27.5% vs. 21.5%, p=0.029; atrial fibrillation (AF): 26.9% vs. 15.6%, p<0.001). Despite higher NYHA classes in the older age group, ejection fractions were comparable (27.2±7.1% ≥75years, 26.2±7.1% <75years, p=0.06). Perioperative complications and mortality rates did not show significant difference between groups. After new device implantation, absolute 1-year mortality was higher in older patients (11.0% ≥75years, 6.4% <75years, p=0.014), with a significantly lower proportion of cardiac deaths in the older group (p=0.05). Patients ≥75years being alive after 1year had lower response rates, with chronic kidney disease (OR 0.46, p<0.05) and smaller QRS complexes (OR 0.31, p<0.01) being particular risk factors for missing improvement of heart failure symptoms. As expected severe heart failure (NYHA IV) was a strong independent predictor of death (HR 1.95, p=0.01), whereas AF as underlying rhythm could be worked out as predictor for mortality especially in the younger patients (HR 2.31, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≥75years of age receiving a CRT device do not have a higher perioperative mortality and complication rate although comorbidities (CKD and AF) occur more frequently. The absolute 1-year mortality is higher; nevertheless, the proportion of cardiac deaths is even lower in the older patients reflecting a benefit of CRT in this group.

摘要

目的

关于老年患者心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的证据稀少且相互矛盾。然而,随着心力衰竭患病率随年龄增长而增加,老年患者的CRT具有重大的实际意义。

方法

德国器械注册研究(DEVICE)是一项全国性的前瞻性注册研究,采用纵向随访设计,调查德国60个中心的器械植入情况。本研究对DEVICE的分析重点关注≥75岁患者(n = 320)与接受CRT器械的年轻患者(n = 879)的围手术期并发症发生率和1年结局。

结果

老年患者的合并症更为常见(慢性肾脏病(CKD):27.5% 对21.5%,p = 0.029;心房颤动(AF):26.9% 对15.6%,p < 0.001)。尽管老年组纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级较高,但射血分数相当(≥75岁为27.2±7.1%,<75岁为26.2±7.1%,p = 0.06)。两组间围手术期并发症和死亡率无显著差异。植入新器械后,老年患者的绝对1年死亡率较高(≥75岁为11.0%,<75岁为6.4%,p = 0.014),老年组心脏性死亡比例显著较低(p = 0.05)。1年后仍存活的≥75岁患者反应率较低,慢性肾脏病(比值比[OR] 0.46,p < 0.05)和较小的QRS波群(OR 0.31,p < 0.01)是心力衰竭症状改善不佳的特别危险因素。正如预期的那样,严重心力衰竭(NYHA IV级)是死亡的强有力独立预测因素(风险比[HR] 1.95,p = 0.01),而房颤作为基础心律可被确定为死亡率的预测因素,尤其是在年轻患者中(HR 2.31,p = 0.002)。

结论

接受CRT器械的≥75岁患者围手术期死亡率和并发症发生率并不更高,尽管合并症(CKD和AF)更频繁发生。绝对1年死亡率较高;然而,老年患者心脏性死亡比例更低,这反映了CRT对该组患者的益处。

相似文献

1
Complications and 1-year benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients over 75 years of age - Insights from the German Device Registry.75岁以上患者心脏再同步治疗的并发症及1年获益——来自德国器械注册研究的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:784-789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.212. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Impact of atrial fibrillation on early complications and one year-survival after cardioverter defibrillator implantation: results from the German DEVICE registry.心房颤动对植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术后早期并发症及一年生存率的影响:来自德国DEVICE注册研究的结果
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):4184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
3
Selection and outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy: Comparison of 4384 patients from the German Device Registry to randomized controlled trials.接受和未接受心脏再同步治疗的植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的选择及预后:德国器械注册中心4384例患者与随机对照试验的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;33(3):483-492. doi: 10.1111/jce.15365. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
4
QRS duration, bundle-branch block morphology, and outcomes among older patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.QRS 时限、束支传导阻滞形态与心力衰竭老年患者心脏再同步治疗的结局
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):617-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8641.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator improves long-term survival compared with cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker in patients with a class IA indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy: data from the Contak Italian Registry.心脏再同步治疗除颤器与心脏再同步治疗起搏器相比,可改善 I 类心脏再同步治疗适应证患者的长期生存率:来自 Contak 意大利注册研究的数据。
Europace. 2013 Sep;15(9):1273-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut032. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
6
Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome of patients with heart failure undergoing ICD and CRT procedures: results from the German Device Registry.糖尿病对接受 ICD 和 CRT 治疗的心力衰竭患者临床结局的影响:来自德国器械注册研究的数据。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):984-995. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12613. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
Clinical outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients 80 years of age and older.80岁及以上心脏再同步化治疗除颤器接受者的临床结局
Europace. 2016 Mar;18(3):420-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv222. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Applicability of a risk score for prediction of the long-term benefit of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.用于预测接受心脏再同步治疗的患者中植入式心脏复律除颤器的长期获益的风险评分的适用性。
Europace. 2016 Aug;18(8):1187-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv352. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
9
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients Using a Pacemaker versus a Defibrillator.使用起搏器与除颤器的老年心脏再同步治疗接受者的临床特征及结局
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):730-4. doi: 10.1111/jce.12951. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Reduced long-term overall mortality in heart failure patients with prolonged QRS treated with CRT combined with ICD vs. heart failure patients with narrow QRS treated with ICD only.与仅接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的窄QRS波心力衰竭患者相比,接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)联合ICD治疗的宽QRS波心力衰竭患者长期总体死亡率降低。
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1374-82. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv347. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel two-lead cardiac resynchronization therapy system provides equivalent CRT responses with less complications than a conventional three-lead system: Results from the QP ExCELs lead registry.新型双导联心脏再同步治疗系统与传统三导联系统相比,能提供同等的心脏再同步治疗效果且并发症更少:QP ExCELs导联注册研究结果
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):1784-1792. doi: 10.1111/jce.14552. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome of patients with heart failure undergoing ICD and CRT procedures: results from the German Device Registry.糖尿病对接受 ICD 和 CRT 治疗的心力衰竭患者临床结局的影响:来自德国器械注册研究的数据。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):984-995. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12613. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
3
Can we rely on Danish? Real-world data on patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy from the German Device Registry.
我们能信赖丹麦的数据吗?来自德国器械注册中心的非缺血性心肌病患者的真实世界数据。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Jul;34(7):1196-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-01337-2. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
4
Contemporary Management of Heart Failure in the Elderly.老年人心力衰竭的当代管理
Drugs Aging. 2019 Feb;36(2):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0625-4.
5
[Chronic heart failure in older patients : Updated national healthcare guidelines on chronic heart failure from a geriatric perspective].[老年患者慢性心力衰竭:从老年医学角度更新的慢性心力衰竭国家医疗指南]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Feb;51(2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s00391-018-1371-2. Epub 2018 Jan 26.