Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Paris, France.
Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Paris, France; Institut Cochin, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1016, Laboratoire d'Immunologie and Département de Génetique, Développement et Cancer, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):280.e1-280.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1042. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
Assisted reproductive technology is one of the therapeutic options offered for managing endometriosis-associated infertility. Yet, published data on assisted reproductive technology outcome in women affected by endometriosis are conflicting and the determinant factors for pregnancy chances unclear.
We sought to evaluate assisted reproductive technology outcomes in a series of 359 endometriosis patients, to identify prognostic factors and determine if there is an impact of the endometriosis phenotype.
This was a retrospective observational cohort study, including 359 consecutive endometriosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, from June 2005 through February 2013 at a university hospital. Endometriotic lesions were classified into 3 phenotypes-superficial peritoneal endometriosis, endometrioma, or deep infiltrating endometriosis-based on imaging criteria (transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging); histological proof confirmed the diagnosis in women with a history of surgery for endometriosis. Main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates per cycle and per embryo transfer. Prognostic factors of assisted reproductive technology outcome were identified by comparing women who became pregnant and those who did not, using univariate and adjusted multiple logistic regression models.
In all, 359 endometriosis patients underwent 720 assisted reproductive technology cycles. In all, 158 (44%) patients became pregnant, and 114 (31.8%) had a live birth. The clinical pregnancy rate and the live birth rate per embryo transfer were 36.4% and 22.8%, respectively. The endometriosis phenotype (superficial endometriosis, endometrioma, or deep infiltrating endometriosis) had no impact on assisted reproductive technology outcomes. After multivariate analysis, history of surgery for endometriosis (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence ratio, 0.06-0.38) or past surgery for endometrioma (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence ratio, 0.18-0.84) were independent factors associated with lower pregnancy rates. Anti-müllerian hormone levels <2 ng/mL (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence ratio, 0.28-0.91) and antral follicle count <10 (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence ratio, 0.14-0.53) were also associated with negative assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
The endometriosis phenotype seems to have no impact on assisted reproductive technology results. An altered ovarian reserve and a previous surgery for endometriosis and/or endometrioma are associated with decreased pregnancy rates.
辅助生殖技术是治疗子宫内膜异位症相关不孕的治疗选择之一。然而,关于子宫内膜异位症患者辅助生殖技术结局的已有数据存在争议,妊娠机会的决定因素尚不清楚。
我们旨在评估 359 例子宫内膜异位症患者的辅助生殖技术结局,以确定预测因素,并确定子宫内膜异位症表型是否有影响。
这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,纳入了 2005 年 6 月至 2013 年 2 月在一家大学医院接受体外受精或胞浆内精子注射的 359 例连续子宫内膜异位症患者。根据影像学标准(经阴道超声、磁共振成像)将子宫内膜异位病变分为 3 种表型-腹膜表面子宫内膜异位症、子宫内膜瘤或深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症;有子宫内膜异位症手术史的女性通过组织学证实了诊断。主要结局指标为每周期和每胚胎转移的临床妊娠率和活产率。通过比较妊娠组和未妊娠组,采用单变量和调整后的多因素逻辑回归模型确定辅助生殖技术结局的预测因素。
共有 359 例子宫内膜异位症患者接受了 720 个辅助生殖技术周期。共有 158 例(44%)患者妊娠,114 例(31.8%)患者活产。临床妊娠率和胚胎移植的活产率分别为 36.4%和 22.8%。子宫内膜异位症表型(腹膜表面子宫内膜异位症、子宫内膜瘤或深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症)对辅助生殖技术结局无影响。多因素分析后,子宫内膜异位症手术史(比值比,0.14;95%置信区间,0.06-0.38)或子宫内膜瘤手术史(比值比,0.39;95%置信区间,0.18-0.84)是妊娠率降低的独立因素。抗苗勒管激素水平<2ng/ml(比值比,0.51;95%置信区间,0.28-0.91)和窦卵泡计数<10(比值比,0.27;95%置信区间,0.14-0.53)也与辅助生殖技术结局不良相关。
子宫内膜异位症表型似乎对辅助生殖技术结果没有影响。卵巢储备功能改变以及子宫内膜异位症和/或子宫内膜瘤的既往手术与妊娠率降低有关。