Suppr超能文献

标准化读写和计算测试测试的是什么?对学生标准化教育考试表现的领域一般性贡献的证据。

What are standardized literacy and numeracy tests testing? Evidence of the domain-general contributions to students' standardized educational test performance.

机构信息

School of Education, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Mar;87(1):108-122. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12138. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A fundamental aim of standardized educational assessment is to achieve reliable discrimination between students differing in the knowledge, skills and abilities assessed. However, questions of the purity with which these tests index students' genuine abilities have arisen. Specifically, literacy and numeracy assessments may also engage unintentionally assessed capacities.

AIMS

The current study investigated the extent to which domain-general processes - working memory (WM) and non-verbal reasoning - contribute to students' standardized test performance and the pathway(s) through which they exert this influence.

SAMPLE

Participants were 91 Grade 2 students recruited from five regional and metropolitan primary schools in Australia.

METHODS

Participants completed measures of WM and non-verbal reasoning, as well as literacy and numeracy subtests of a national standardized educational assessment.

RESULTS

Path analysis of Rasch-derived ability estimates and residuals with domain-general cognitive abilities indicated: (1) a consistent indirect pathway from WM to literacy and numeracy ability, through non-verbal reasoning; (2) direct paths from phonological WM and literacy ability to numeracy ability estimates; and (3) a direct path from WM to spelling test residuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that the constitution of this nationwide standardized assessment confounded non-targeted abilities with those that were the target of assessment. This appears to extend beyond the effect of WM on learning more generally, to the demands of different assessment types and methods. This has implications for students' abilities to demonstrate genuine competency in assessed areas and the educational supports and provisions they are provided on the basis of these results.

摘要

背景

标准化教育评估的一个基本目标是在知识、技能和能力方面存在差异的学生之间实现可靠的区分。然而,这些测试是否能真正准确地评估学生的能力已经引起了质疑。具体来说,读写和计算能力评估可能也会无意中评估学生的其他能力。

目的

本研究旨在探讨领域一般性过程(工作记忆和非言语推理)在多大程度上对学生的标准化测试表现产生影响,以及它们通过何种途径产生影响。

样本

参与者为来自澳大利亚五所地区和都会区小学的 91 名二年级学生。

方法

参与者完成了工作记忆和非言语推理的测量,以及全国标准化教育评估的读写和计算子测试。

结果

对基于 Rasch 的能力估计和残差与领域一般性认知能力的路径分析表明:(1)工作记忆通过非言语推理对读写和计算能力有一致的间接影响;(2)语音工作记忆和读写能力对计算能力估计有直接影响;(3)工作记忆对拼写测试残差有直接影响。

结论

结果表明,这种全国性标准化评估的构成混淆了非目标能力和评估目标能力。这似乎不仅限于工作记忆对更广泛学习的影响,还涉及到不同评估类型和方法的要求。这对学生在评估领域展示真正能力的能力以及他们基于这些结果获得的教育支持和规定产生了影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验