• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么吸烟者会谈论反吸烟运动?引发运动对话的发生和内容的预测因素。

Why Do Smokers Talk About Antismoking Campaigns? Predictors of the Occurrence and Content of Campaign-Generated Conversations.

机构信息

a Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer , Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

b Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2017 Dec;32(12):1539-1556. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1239301. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2016.1239301
PMID:27902887
Abstract

Smokers often talk about antismoking campaigns, and these conversations can contribute to campaign effectiveness. However, little is known about the predictors and content of naturally occurring campaign-generated conversations. In two studies (Study 1, N = 480; Study 2, N = 232), we systematically examined whether the occurrence and content of smokers' conversations after exposure to one of eight antismoking television advertisements were predicted by characteristics of (a) the message, (b) intrapersonal responses to the message, (c) the individual, and (d) the social context in which exposure occurred. In multivariable models, we found that conversations were more likely to occur when advertisement exposure occurred in the presence of others, and as the amount of anxiety elicited by the advertisement increased. Conversations were more likely to contain a favorable appraisal of the advertisement when the message elicited higher levels of sadness, and less likely to contain favorable appraisals when the respondent had finished secondary education (vs. lower levels of education). Stronger feelings of guilt reduced the likelihood that conversations contained unfavorable appraisals, and increased the likelihood that they contained quitting talk. These findings suggest several promising avenues for future investigations into why smokers talk and talk in particular ways.

摘要

吸烟者经常谈论反吸烟运动,这些对话可以有助于提高运动的效果。然而,对于自然产生的、由运动引发的对话的预测因素和内容却知之甚少。在两项研究中(研究 1,N=480;研究 2,N=232),我们系统地考察了吸烟者在接触八个反吸烟电视广告中的一个后,其对话的发生和内容是否可以由以下特征来预测:(a)信息,(b)对信息的个人反应,(c)个体,以及(d)发生接触的社会环境。在多变量模型中,我们发现当广告暴露在他人在场的情况下,以及当广告引起的焦虑程度增加时,对话更有可能发生。当信息引起更高水平的悲伤时,对话更有可能对广告进行有利的评价,而当受访者完成中等教育(与较低的教育水平相比)时,对话不太可能包含有利的评价。更强的内疚感降低了对话包含不利评价的可能性,而增加了对话包含戒烟言论的可能性。这些发现为未来调查吸烟者为什么以特定方式交谈以及交谈的原因提供了几个有前途的途径。

相似文献

1
Why Do Smokers Talk About Antismoking Campaigns? Predictors of the Occurrence and Content of Campaign-Generated Conversations.为什么吸烟者会谈论反吸烟运动?引发运动对话的发生和内容的预测因素。
Health Commun. 2017 Dec;32(12):1539-1556. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1239301. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
2
Talking About Antismoking Campaigns: What Do Smokers Talk About, and How Does Talk Influence Campaign Effectiveness?谈论反吸烟运动:吸烟者谈论些什么,以及谈话如何影响运动效果?
J Health Commun. 2016;21(1):33-45. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1039675. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
The potential of shame as a message appeal in antismoking television advertisements.羞耻感作为反吸烟电视广告中一种信息诉求的潜力。
Tob Control. 2015 Sep;24(5):436-41. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051737. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
4
The influence of antismoking television advertisements on cessation by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and mental health status.反吸烟电视广告对不同种族/族裔、社会经济地位和心理健康状况人群戒烟的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 17;9(7):e102943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102943. eCollection 2014.
5
Promotion of smoking cessation with emotional and/or graphic antismoking advertising.采用情感和/或图形反吸烟广告促进戒烟。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.023.
6
Which Type of Antismoking Advertisement Is Perceived as More Effective? An Experimental Study With a Sample of Australian Socially Disadvantaged Welfare Recipients.哪种类型的反吸烟广告被认为更有效?一项以澳大利亚社会弱势福利领取者为样本的实验研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 May;31(3):209-216. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141125-QUAN-593. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Talking About Quitting: Interpersonal Communication as a Mediator of Campaign Effects on Smokers' Quit Behaviors.谈论戒烟:人际沟通作为戒烟运动对吸烟者戒烟行为影响的调节因素
J Health Commun. 2015;20(10):1196-205. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018620. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
8
Increasing the dose of television advertising in a national antismoking media campaign: results from a randomised field trial.在全国性的反吸烟媒体宣传活动中增加电视广告投放剂量:一项随机现场试验的结果
Tob Control. 2017 Jan;26(1):19-28. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052517. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
9
Awareness and impact of the 'Bubblewrap' advertising campaign among Aboriginal smokers in Western Australia.西澳大利亚地区原住民烟民对“气泡纸”广告活动的认知及其影响。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):83-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031856. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
10
Interpersonal communication as an indirect pathway for the effect of antismoking media content on smoking cessation.人际传播是戒烟媒体内容对戒烟效果的间接途径。
J Health Commun. 2011 May;16(5):470-85. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546487.

引用本文的文献

1
From Health Campaign to Interpersonal Communication: Does Traditional Diet Culture Hinder the Communication of the Chinese Campaign?从健康运动到人际传播:传统饮食文化是否阻碍了中国 运动的传播?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 13;19(16):9992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169992.
2
Does Perceived Message Effectiveness Predict the Actual Effectiveness of Tobacco Education Messages? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.感知信息效果是否能预测烟草教育信息的实际效果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Commun. 2020 Feb;35(2):148-157. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1547675. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
Testing the Replication and Extension of Why-Quit and How-To-Quit Antismoking Health Messages.
测试“Why- Quit(为何戒烟)”和“How-To-Quit(如何戒烟)”反吸烟健康信息的复制和扩展。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(7):597-605. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1493062. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Sharing Tobacco and E-Cigarette Information: Predicting its Occurrence and Valence among Youth and Young Adults.分享烟草和电子烟信息:预测青少年和年轻人中的发生和效价。
Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1114-1123. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1331310. Epub 2017 Jun 16.