a Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
b Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1114-1123. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1331310. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
While interpersonal communication has been shown to influence smoking-related outcomes, mostly in the context of interventions, there is not much research showing what drives young people to talk about tobacco or e-cigarettes. Additionally, the changing media environment calls for research that expands the scope of what is included as interpersonal communication to include not just conversations but also online forms of communicating information. This study puts forth sharing as such a concept, and examines its prevalence and predictors in the context of tobacco and e-cigarette information. Using a nationally representative rolling cross-sectional (N = 9,115) and recontact (N = 2,413) survey of 13-25-year olds, this study found that most young people shared negatively about tobacco (56% of 1,514 tobacco sharers at Time 1) and mixed information about e-cigarettes (41% of 968 e-cigarette sharers). Sharing occurrence was predicted by topical relevance and recent exposure to information, while pro-tobacco and pro-e-cigarette sharing (compared to no sharing) were predicted by relevance, and descriptive and injunctive norms. Significant moderation analyses showed that perceived norms undermined the effect of relevance on the valence in which one shared about tobacco and e-cigarettes. These findings provide a foundation upon which to build subsequent research on the impact of sharing, which could help inform future tobacco and e-cigarette control efforts.
虽然人际沟通已被证明会影响与吸烟相关的结果,尤其是在干预的背景下,但很少有研究表明是什么促使年轻人谈论烟草或电子烟。此外,不断变化的媒体环境要求研究扩大人际沟通的范围,不仅包括对话,还包括在线交流信息的形式。本研究提出了分享这一概念,并在烟草和电子烟信息的背景下,考察了其普遍性及其预测因素。本研究使用全国代表性的滚动横断面(N=9115)和重新联系(N=2413)调查了 13-25 岁的年轻人,发现大多数年轻人对烟草持负面态度(在 1345 名烟草分享者中,有 56%在第 1 次分享时这样做),对电子烟的信息则是混合态度(在 968 名电子烟分享者中,有 41%这样做)。分享的发生受到主题相关性和最近接触信息的预测,而赞成烟草和赞成电子烟的分享(与不分享相比)则受到相关性、描述性和规范性规范的预测。显著的调节分析表明,感知规范破坏了相关性对人们分享烟草和电子烟的态度的影响。这些发现为进一步研究分享的影响提供了基础,这有助于为未来的烟草和电子烟控制工作提供信息。