Suppr超能文献

基于钙通道阻滞剂贝尼地平的联合治疗对目标血压控制和心血管结局的影响:COPE试验的亚组分析

Effects of calcium channel blocker benidipine-based combination therapy on target blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcome: a sub-analysis of the COPE trial.

作者信息

Umemoto Seiji, Ogihara Toshio, Matsuzaki Masunori, Rakugi Hiromi, Ohashi Yasuo, Saruta Takao

机构信息

Center for Integrated Medical Research, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2017 Apr;40(4):376-384. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.158. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

Abstract

We compared three benidipine-based regimens-that is, benidipine plus angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), β-blocker (BB) or thiazide-and found that the benidipine-BB combination was less beneficial in reducing the risk of stroke than the benidipine-thiazide combination. This sub-analysis sought to compare the effects of reaching a target blood pressure (BP) (<140/90 mm Hg) on the cardiovascular outcomes among the three benidipine-based treatment groups in the Combination Therapy of Hypertension to Prevent Cardiovascular Events trial. This sub-analysis included 3001 subjects to evaluate the achievement of target BP at a minimum of three points at 6-month intervals of clinical BP measurements during the study period. After randomization, the patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of achieved on-treatment target BP: a good control (GC) group achieving a BP⩾66.7% of the target and a poor control (PC) group with a BP <66.6% of the target. For each of the two control groups, outcomes were compared among the three treatment groups. The event rates for cardiovascular composite endpoints, stroke and hard cardiovascular events were higher in the PC group than the GC group (P=0.041, P=0.042 and P=0.038, respectively). Within the PC group, hazard ratios for the incidence of cardiovascular events were lower in the benidipine-thiazide group than in the benidipine-BB group (composite cardiovascular events: 2.04, P=0.033; stroke: 4.14, P=0.005; and hard cardiovascular events: 3.52, P=0.009). Within the GC group, the incidence of cardiovascular events was not different among the three treatment regimens. The benidipine-thiazide combination may provide better cardiovascular outcomes than the benidipine-BB combination even in patients with poor BP control.

摘要

我们比较了三种基于贝尼地平的治疗方案,即贝尼地平加血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)或噻嗪类药物,发现贝尼地平与BB联合用药在降低中风风险方面不如贝尼地平与噻嗪类药物联合用药有益。这项亚组分析旨在比较在高血压联合治疗预防心血管事件试验中,三种基于贝尼地平的治疗组达到目标血压(<140/90 mmHg)对心血管结局的影响。该亚组分析纳入了3001名受试者,以评估在研究期间每隔6个月进行临床血压测量时,至少在三个时间点达到目标血压的情况。随机分组后,根据治疗期间达到的目标血压将患者分为两组:血压达到目标值⩾66.7%的良好控制(GC)组和血压<目标值66.6%的控制不佳(PC)组。对于这两个对照组中的每一组,比较了三个治疗组的结局。心血管复合终点、中风和严重心血管事件的发生率在PC组高于GC组(分别为P=0.041、P=0.042和P=0.038)。在PC组中,贝尼地平与噻嗪类药物联合组心血管事件发生率的风险比低于贝尼地平与BB联合组(复合心血管事件:2.04,P=0.033;中风:4.14,P=0.005;严重心血管事件:3.52,P=0.009)。在GC组中,三种治疗方案的心血管事件发生率没有差异。即使在血压控制不佳的患者中,贝尼地平与噻嗪类药物联合用药可能比贝尼地平与BB联合用药提供更好的心血管结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f5/5506236/6b067c8991ce/hr2016158f2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验