Suppr超能文献

长效二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂贝尼地平对日本高血压门诊患者降压效果及血管和肾脏事件的影响:COPE 试验的一项亚组分析。

Effects of an Antihypertensive Combination in Japanese Hypertensive Outpatients Based on the Long-acting Calcium Channel Blocker Benidipine on Vascular and Renal Events: A Sub-analysis of the COPE Trial.

机构信息

Center for Integrated Medical Research, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Curr Hypertens Rev. 2020;16(3):238-245. doi: 10.2174/1573402116666200129130151.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the trial known as COPE (Combination Therapy of Hypertension to Prevent Cardiovascular Events), three benidipine (a Calcium Channel Blocker; CCB) regimens were compared. Hypertensive Japanese outpatients aged 40-85 years (n=3,293) who did not achieve the target blood pressure of <140/90 mmHg with benidipine 4 mg/day were treated with the diuretic thiazide (n=1,094) or a β-blocker (n=1,089) or an additional Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB; n=1,110). A significantly higher incidence of hard cardiovascular composite endpoints and of fatal or non-fatal strokes was observed in the benidipine-β-blocker group compared to the benidipine-thiazide group.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

We further evaluated the treatment effects of the three benidipine-based regimens on vascular and renal events in a sub-analysis of the COPE patients.

RESULTS

A total of 10 vascular events (0.8 per 1,000 person-years) including one aortic dissection (0.1 per 1,000 person-years) and nine cases of peripheral artery disease (0.8 per 1,000 person-years) were documented, as was a total of seven renal events (0.6 per 1,000 person-years). No significant differences in vascular and renal events were revealed among the three treatment groups: vascular events, p=0.92; renal events, p=0.16, log-rank test.

CONCLUSION

Blood pressure-lowering therapy with benidipine combined with an ARB, β-blocker, or thiazide was similarly effective in the prevention of vascular and renal events in hypertensive outpatients, although there are not enough events to compare the difference in the three treatment groups.

摘要

背景

在 COPE 试验(联合降压治疗预防心血管事件)中,比较了三种贝尼地平(一种钙通道阻滞剂;CCB)方案。未达到贝尼地平 4mg/天目标血压<140/90mmHg 的年龄在 40-85 岁的日本高血压门诊患者(n=3293),加用噻嗪类利尿剂(n=1094)或β受体阻滞剂(n=1089)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB;n=1110)。与贝尼地平-噻嗪组相比,贝尼地平-β受体阻滞剂组的硬心血管复合终点和致命或非致命性卒中发生率显著更高。

目的和方法

我们在 COPE 患者的亚分析中进一步评估了三种基于贝尼地平的方案对血管和肾脏事件的治疗效果。

结果

共记录了 10 例血管事件(每 1000 人年 0.8 例),包括 1 例主动脉夹层(每 1000 人年 0.1 例)和 9 例外周动脉疾病(每 1000 人年 0.8 例),共 7 例肾脏事件(每 1000 人年 0.6 例)。三组治疗之间的血管和肾脏事件无显著差异:血管事件,p=0.92;肾脏事件,p=0.16,对数秩检验。

结论

在高血压门诊患者中,贝尼地平联合 ARB、β受体阻滞剂或噻嗪类利尿剂降压治疗在预防血管和肾脏事件方面同样有效,尽管三组治疗之间的差异比较事件不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验