• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在预防性健康检查中纳入肺功能测定的重点信息对就诊率的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Effect on attendance by including focused information on spirometry in preventive health checks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Ørts Lene Maria, Løkke Anders, Bjerregaard Anne-Louise, Maindal Helle Terkildsen, Sandbæk Annelli

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Section for General Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Trials. 2016 Dec 1;17(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1704-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-016-1704-7
PMID:27906034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5134092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of lung diseases can help to reduce their severity. Lung diseases are among the most frequently occurring and serious diseases worldwide; nonetheless, many patients remain undiagnosed. Preventive health checks including spirometry can detect lung diseases at early stages; however, recruitment for health checks remains a challenge, and little is known about what motivates the attendance. The aim of the study is to examine whether focused information on spirometry in the invitation compared to general information will impact the attendance rate in preventive health checks.

METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized, controlled trial tests the effect of information on spirometry embedded in the Check your Health Preventive Program (CHPP). The CHPP is an open-label, household cluster-randomized, controlled trial offering a preventive health check to 30- to -49-year-olds in a Danish municipality from 2012 to 2017 (n = 26,216). During 2015-2016, 4356 citizens aged 30-49 years will be randomized into two groups. The intervention group receives an invitation which highlights the value and contents of spirometry as part of a health check and information about lung diseases. The comparison group receives a standard invitation containing practical information and specifies the contents of the general health check. Outcomes are (1) differences in attendance rates measured by the proportion of citizens attending each of the two study groups and (2) proportion of persons at risk defined by smoking status and self-reported lung symptoms in the study groups. The proportion of participants with abnormal spirometry assessed at the preventive health check will be compared between the two study groups.

DISCUSSION

The results from the present study will inform future recruitment strategies to health checks. The developed material on content, value, and information about lung disease is feasible and transferable to other populations, making it easy to implement if effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02615769 . Registered on 25 November 2015.

摘要

背景

肺部疾病的早期检测有助于减轻其严重程度。肺部疾病是全球最常见且最严重的疾病之一;尽管如此,仍有许多患者未被诊断出来。包括肺活量测定在内的预防性健康检查能够在早期阶段检测出肺部疾病;然而,健康检查的招募工作仍然是一项挑战,对于促使人们参加检查的因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是检验与提供一般信息相比,在邀请函中重点提及肺活量测定信息是否会影响预防性健康检查的参与率。

方法/设计:这项随机对照试验测试了在“检查您的健康”预防性项目(CHPP)中嵌入的肺活量测定信息的效果。CHPP是一项开放标签、家庭整群随机对照试验,在2012年至2017年期间为丹麦一个自治市的30至49岁人群提供预防性健康检查(n = 26,216)。在2015 - 2016年期间,4356名30至49岁的公民将被随机分为两组。干预组收到的邀请函强调了肺活量测定作为健康检查一部分的价值和内容以及有关肺部疾病的信息。对照组收到的是包含实用信息并详细说明一般健康检查内容的标准邀请函。结果指标为:(1)通过两个研究组中每组公民的参与比例衡量的参与率差异;(2)根据吸烟状况和自我报告的肺部症状确定的研究组中高危人群的比例。将比较两个研究组中在预防性健康检查时肺活量测定异常的参与者比例。

讨论

本研究的结果将为未来健康检查的招募策略提供参考。所开发的关于肺部疾病的内容、价值和信息的材料是可行的,并且可推广到其他人群,如果有效则易于实施。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02615769。于2015年11月25日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3b/5134092/7a3390f228d2/13063_2016_1704_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3b/5134092/7a3390f228d2/13063_2016_1704_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3b/5134092/7a3390f228d2/13063_2016_1704_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect on attendance by including focused information on spirometry in preventive health checks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在预防性健康检查中纳入肺功能测定的重点信息对就诊率的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 1;17(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1704-7.
2
The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark.在健康检查邀请中纳入聚焦式肺活量测定信息对参与率的影响:丹麦的一项集群随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5.
3
Effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.在预防性健康检查中纳入体能测试对心肺适能和动机的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 10;14:1057. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1057.
4
Enhanced invitation methods to increase uptake of NHS health checks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.增强邀请方法以提高国民保健服务健康检查的接受率:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Aug 30;15:342. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-342.
5
Effects of a Co-Design-Based Invitation Strategy on Participation in a Preventive Health Check Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于共同设计的邀请策略对参与预防保健检查计划的效果:随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Mar 10;7(3):e25617. doi: 10.2196/25617.
6
The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.丹麦心血管筛查试验(DANCAVAS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Dec 5;16:554. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1082-6.
7
Using general practitioners to recruit individuals with low socioeconomic position to preventive health checks is feasible: a cross sectional study.利用全科医生招募社会经济地位较低的个体进行预防保健检查是可行的:一项横断面研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Sep;37(3):294-301. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1639901. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.强化邀请信对初级医疗中接受国民健康服务健康检查的效果:一项实用的半随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 24;17:35. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0426-y.
9
Multicentric randomized clinical trial to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of a motivational intervention against smoking, based on the information obtained from spirometry in primary care: the RESET study protocol.基于初级保健中肺活量测定所获信息评估戒烟动机干预长期效果的多中心随机临床试验:RESET研究方案
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Feb 4;17:15. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0415-1.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark.在健康检查邀请中纳入聚焦式肺活量测定信息对参与率的影响:丹麦的一项集群随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5.
2
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.成人进行一般健康检查以降低疾病的发病率和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD009009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): protocol for a randomised controlled demonstration lung cancer screening pilot testing a targeted invitation strategy for high risk and 'hard-to-reach' patients.肺部筛查纳入试验(LSUT):一项随机对照示范性肺癌筛查试验方案,用于测试针对高危和“难以接触到”患者的定向邀请策略。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Apr 20;16:281. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2316-z.
2
The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.强化邀请信对初级医疗中接受国民健康服务健康检查的效果:一项实用的半随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 24;17:35. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0426-y.
3
The majority of participants with abnormal spirometry at walk-in consult their general practitioner as recommended.
大多数在初诊时肺功能测定异常的参与者会按建议咨询他们的全科医生。
Dan Med J. 2015 Nov;62(11):A5149.
4
Lung-Function Trajectories Leading to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.导致慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺功能轨迹。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):111-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411532.
5
Effectiveness of the population-based Check your health preventive programme conducted in primary care with 4 years follow-up [the CORE trial]: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在初级保健机构开展的、为期4年随访的基于人群的“检查你的健康”预防项目的有效性[CORE试验]:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Aug 29;15:341. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-341.
6
The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology.丹麦民事登记系统在流行病学中的应用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
7
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 解释和说明:临床试验方案指南。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
8
The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials.临床试验中缺失数据的预防与处理
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1355-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1203730.
9
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:群组随机试验扩展版》
BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661.
10
What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review.我们对谁参加和不参加一般健康检查了解多少?叙事范围综述的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 31;12:723. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-723.