Suppr超能文献

使用美国放射肿瘤学会(RTOG)共识定义和在线每日CT扫描来评估前列腺床靶区的分次间运动:临床靶区的上部和下部之间的靶区运动是否存在差异?

Prostate bed target interfractional motion using RTOG consensus definitions and daily CT on rails : Does target motion differ between superior and inferior portions of the clinical target volume?

作者信息

Verma Vivek, Chen Shifeng, Zhou Sumin, Enke Charles A, Wahl Andrew O

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, NE 68198, Omaha, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Jan;193(1):38-45. doi: 10.1007/s00066-016-1077-6. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Using high-quality CT-on-rails imaging, the daily motion of the prostate bed clinical target volume (PB-CTV) based on consensus Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) definitions (instead of surgical clips/fiducials) was studied. It was assessed whether PB motion in the superior portion of PB-CTV (SUP-CTV) differed from the inferior PB-CTV (INF-CTV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight pT2-3bN0-1M0 patients underwent postprostatectomy intensity-modulated radiotherapy, totaling 300 fractions. INF-CTV and SUP-CTV were defined as PB-CTV located inferior and superior to the superior border of the pubic symphysis, respectively. Daily pretreatment CT-on-rails images were compared to the planning CT in the left-right (LR), superoinferior (SI), and anteroposterior (AP) directions. Two parameters were defined: "total PB-CTV motion" represented total shifts from skin tattoos to RTOG-defined anatomic areas; "PB-CTV target motion" (performed for both SUP-CTV and INF-CTV) represented shifts from bone to RTOG-defined anatomic areas (i. e., subtracting shifts from skin tattoos to bone).

RESULTS

Mean (± standard deviation, SD) total PB-CTV motion was -1.5 (± 6.0), 1.3 (± 4.5), and 3.7 (± 5.7) mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. Mean (± SD) PB-CTV target motion was 0.2 (±1.4), 0.3 (±2.4), and 0 (±3.1) mm in the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. Mean (± SD) INF-CTV target motion was 0.1 (± 2.8), 0.5 (± 2.2), and 0.2 (± 2.5) mm, and SUP-CTV target motion was 0.3 (± 1.8), 0.5 (± 2.3), and 0 (± 5.0) mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. No statistically significant differences between INF-CTV and SUP-CTV motion were present in any direction.

CONCLUSION

There are no statistically apparent motion differences between SUP-CTV and INF-CTV. Current uniform planning target volume (PTV) margins are adequate to cover both portions of the CTV.

摘要

目的

使用高质量的轨道CT成像,研究基于放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)共识定义(而非手术夹/基准标记)的前列腺床临床靶区(PB-CTV)的日常运动情况。评估PB-CTV上部(SUP-CTV)和下部(INF-CTV)的PB运动是否存在差异。

患者与方法

8例pT2-3bN0-1M0患者接受前列腺切除术后调强放疗,共300次分割。INF-CTV和SUP-CTV分别定义为位于耻骨联合上缘下方和上方的PB-CTV。将每日治疗前的轨道CT图像与计划CT在左右(LR)、上下(SI)和前后(AP)方向上进行比较。定义了两个参数:“PB-CTV总运动”表示从皮肤标记到RTOG定义的解剖区域的总位移;“PB-CTV靶区运动”(对SUP-CTV和INF-CTV均进行)表示从骨骼到RTOG定义的解剖区域的位移(即减去从皮肤标记到骨骼的位移)。

结果

PB-CTV总运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±标准差,SD)分别为-1.5(±6.0)、1.3(±4.5)和3.7(±5.7)mm。PB-CTV靶区运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±SD)分别为0.2(±1.4)、0.3(±2.4)和0(±3.1)mm。INF-CTV靶区运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±SD)分别为0.1(±2.8)、0.5(±2.2)和0.2(±2.5)mm,SUP-CTV靶区运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±SD)分别为0.3(±1.8)、0.5(±2.3)和0(±5.0)mm。在任何方向上,INF-CTV和SUP-CTV运动之间均无统计学显著差异。

结论

SUP-CTV和INF-CTV之间在统计学上没有明显运动差异。当前统一的计划靶区(PTV)边界足以覆盖CTV的两个部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验