Verma Vivek, Chen Shifeng, Zhou Sumin, Enke Charles A, Wahl Andrew O
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, NE 68198, Omaha, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Jan;193(1):38-45. doi: 10.1007/s00066-016-1077-6. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
Using high-quality CT-on-rails imaging, the daily motion of the prostate bed clinical target volume (PB-CTV) based on consensus Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) definitions (instead of surgical clips/fiducials) was studied. It was assessed whether PB motion in the superior portion of PB-CTV (SUP-CTV) differed from the inferior PB-CTV (INF-CTV).
Eight pT2-3bN0-1M0 patients underwent postprostatectomy intensity-modulated radiotherapy, totaling 300 fractions. INF-CTV and SUP-CTV were defined as PB-CTV located inferior and superior to the superior border of the pubic symphysis, respectively. Daily pretreatment CT-on-rails images were compared to the planning CT in the left-right (LR), superoinferior (SI), and anteroposterior (AP) directions. Two parameters were defined: "total PB-CTV motion" represented total shifts from skin tattoos to RTOG-defined anatomic areas; "PB-CTV target motion" (performed for both SUP-CTV and INF-CTV) represented shifts from bone to RTOG-defined anatomic areas (i. e., subtracting shifts from skin tattoos to bone).
Mean (± standard deviation, SD) total PB-CTV motion was -1.5 (± 6.0), 1.3 (± 4.5), and 3.7 (± 5.7) mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. Mean (± SD) PB-CTV target motion was 0.2 (±1.4), 0.3 (±2.4), and 0 (±3.1) mm in the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. Mean (± SD) INF-CTV target motion was 0.1 (± 2.8), 0.5 (± 2.2), and 0.2 (± 2.5) mm, and SUP-CTV target motion was 0.3 (± 1.8), 0.5 (± 2.3), and 0 (± 5.0) mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. No statistically significant differences between INF-CTV and SUP-CTV motion were present in any direction.
There are no statistically apparent motion differences between SUP-CTV and INF-CTV. Current uniform planning target volume (PTV) margins are adequate to cover both portions of the CTV.
使用高质量的轨道CT成像,研究基于放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)共识定义(而非手术夹/基准标记)的前列腺床临床靶区(PB-CTV)的日常运动情况。评估PB-CTV上部(SUP-CTV)和下部(INF-CTV)的PB运动是否存在差异。
8例pT2-3bN0-1M0患者接受前列腺切除术后调强放疗,共300次分割。INF-CTV和SUP-CTV分别定义为位于耻骨联合上缘下方和上方的PB-CTV。将每日治疗前的轨道CT图像与计划CT在左右(LR)、上下(SI)和前后(AP)方向上进行比较。定义了两个参数:“PB-CTV总运动”表示从皮肤标记到RTOG定义的解剖区域的总位移;“PB-CTV靶区运动”(对SUP-CTV和INF-CTV均进行)表示从骨骼到RTOG定义的解剖区域的位移(即减去从皮肤标记到骨骼的位移)。
PB-CTV总运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±标准差,SD)分别为-1.5(±6.0)、1.3(±4.5)和3.7(±5.7)mm。PB-CTV靶区运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±SD)分别为0.2(±1.4)、0.3(±2.4)和0(±3.1)mm。INF-CTV靶区运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±SD)分别为0.1(±2.8)、0.5(±2.2)和0.2(±2.5)mm,SUP-CTV靶区运动在LR、SI和AP方向上的平均值(±SD)分别为0.3(±1.8)、0.5(±2.3)和0(±5.0)mm。在任何方向上,INF-CTV和SUP-CTV运动之间均无统计学显著差异。
SUP-CTV和INF-CTV之间在统计学上没有明显运动差异。当前统一的计划靶区(PTV)边界足以覆盖CTV的两个部分。