• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手工制作的“类杰基导管”作为单根多功能导管在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中的有效性:与传统双导管策略的随机对照比较。

Effectiveness of Handmade "Jacky-Like Catheter" As a Single Multipurpose Catheter in Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Comparison With Conventional Two-Catheter Strategy.

作者信息

Erden Ismail, Golcuk Ebru, Bozyel Serdar, Erden Emine Cakcak, Balaban Yakup, Yalın Kivanc, Turan Burak

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, VM Medicalpark Kocaeli Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Feb;30(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/joic.12350. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1111/joic.12350
PMID:27910134
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate safety and efficacy of specialized hand-modified "Jacky-Like" catheter (JLC) as a single dual-purpose catheter in transradial coronary angiography.

METHODS

Patients over 18 years undergoing diagnostic CAG through right radial artery (RRA) were prospectively enrolled. Procedures were performed with a single JLC modified from a left Judkins (JL) 3.5 catheter or by using 2-catheter approach (2C). Procedures with coronary artery bypass grafts or ventricular angiographies were excluded from the study. Three hundred and eighty-seven transradial procedures were performed successfully. One hundred and ninety-four procedures were performed with 2C and 193 procedures with a JLC. Inability to use intended catheters, total fluoroscopic time in minutes, the consumption of contrast medium in milliliter, development of radial artery spasm (RAS), and radial artery occlusion (RAO) were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the 2C group, angiography was successfully performed on the RCA of 191 patients (98.9%) and on LCA in 192 patients (99.4%). In the JLC group, angiography was successfully performed on the RCA and LCA of 193 (99.4%) and 174 (89.6%) patients, respectively. Utilization of supplemental catheters was significantly greater in the JLC group (21; 10.8%) versus the 2C group (3; 1.5% P = 0.001). Mean fluoroscopy time was shorter in the JLC group (2.0 ± 2.3 min vs. 2.3 ± 1.5 min; P = 0.043). Mean procedure time was also decreased with JLC but did not reach statistical significance (5.7 ± 3.1 min vs. 6.2 ± 2.5 min; P = 0.081). When additional time for reshaping the JLC was not taken into account, mean procedure time was significantly decreased in the JLC group (5.6 ± 2.9 min vs. 6.2 ± 2.4 min; P = 0.031). There was a trend toward lower incidence of consumption of contrast medium in the 2C group (49 ± 13 mL vs. 52 ± 18 mL; P = 0.061). RAS was observed more frequently in the 2C group (11.3% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.005). There was a trend toward high incidence of RAO in the 2C group (4.1 vs. 8.3% P = 0.064).

CONCLUSION

In transradial procedures from RRA, a JLC catheter can be very effective when dedicated dual-purpose catheter is not available.

摘要

目的

探讨特制手工改良的“类杰基”导管(JLC)作为单根两用导管用于桡动脉冠状动脉造影的安全性和有效性。

方法

前瞻性纳入年龄超过18岁、经右桡动脉(RRA)行诊断性冠状动脉造影(CAG)的患者。使用从左Judkins(JL)3.5导管改良而来的单根JLC进行操作,或采用双导管法(2C)。排除行冠状动脉旁路移植术或心室造影的操作。成功完成了387例桡动脉操作。其中194例采用2C法,193例采用JLC。评估无法使用预期导管的情况、总透视时间(分钟)、造影剂用量(毫升)、桡动脉痉挛(RAS)的发生情况以及桡动脉闭塞(RAO)情况。

结果

在2C组中,191例患者(98.9%)的右冠状动脉(RCA)和192例患者(99.4%)的左冠状动脉(LCA)造影成功。在JLC组中,分别有193例(99.4%)和174例(89.6%)患者的RCA和LCA造影成功。JLC组补充导管的使用率(21例;10.8%)显著高于2C组(3例;1.5%,P = 0.001)。JLC组的平均透视时间较短(2.0±2.3分钟对2.3±1.5分钟;P = 0.043)。使用JLC时平均操作时间也有所缩短,但未达到统计学意义(5.7±3.1分钟对6.2±2.5分钟;P = 0.081)。若不考虑JLC塑形的额外时间,JLC组的平均操作时间显著缩短(5.6±2.9分钟对6.2±2.4分钟;P = 0.031)。2C组造影剂用量有降低趋势(49±13毫升对52±18毫升;P = 0.061)。2C组RAS的发生率更高(11.3%对21.7%,P = 0.005)。2C组RAO的发生率有升高趋势(4.1%对8.3%,P = 0.064)。

结论

在经RRA的桡动脉操作中,当没有专用两用导管时,JLC导管可能非常有效。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Handmade "Jacky-Like Catheter" As a Single Multipurpose Catheter in Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Comparison With Conventional Two-Catheter Strategy.手工制作的“类杰基导管”作为单根多功能导管在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中的有效性:与传统双导管策略的随机对照比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Feb;30(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/joic.12350. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
2
Effectiveness of Left Judkins Catheter as a Single Multipurpose Catheter in Transradial Coronary Angiography From Right Radial Artery: A Randomized Comparison With Conventional Two-Catheter Strategy.左Judkins导管作为经右桡动脉行冠状动脉造影单一多功能导管的有效性:与传统双导管策略的随机对照研究
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Jun;29(3):257-64. doi: 10.1111/joic.12286. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
3
Comparison of Standard Catheters Versus Radial Artery-Specific Catheter in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Angiography Through Transradial Access.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影患者中标准导管与桡动脉专用导管的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;118(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 17.
4
Effectiveness of a handmade "New Carotid Catheter" in transradial carotid angiography: A comparison with conventional multipurpose catheters.手工制作的“新型颈动脉导管”在经桡动脉颈动脉血管造影中的有效性:与传统多功能导管的比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Feb;31(1):94-105. doi: 10.1111/joic.12454. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters.专门为经右桡动脉途径用于冠状动脉而设计的新型诊断导管。Tiger II导管与Judkins导管的前瞻性随机试验。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006 Jun-Aug;22(3-4):295-303. doi: 10.1007/s10554-005-9029-8. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
6
Randomised comparison of JUDkins vs. tiGEr catheter in coronary angiography via the right radial artery: the JUDGE study.经右桡动脉行冠状动脉造影时,JUDkins 与 tiGEr 导管的随机比较:JUDGE 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Mar 20;13(16):1950-1958. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00699.
7
Impact of One-Catheter Strategy with TIG I Catheter on Coronary Catheterization Performance and Economic Costs.TIG I 导管单导管策略对冠状动脉造影性能和经济成本的影响。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Nov;113(5):960-968. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190232.
8
Randomized comparison of transradial coronary angiography via right or left radial artery approaches.经右或左桡动脉入路行随机化冠状动脉造影术的对比研究。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jan 15;107(2):195-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.065. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
9
Comparison of radiation exposure during transradial diagnostic coronary angiography with single- or multi-catheters approach.经桡动脉诊断性冠状动脉造影采用单导管或多导管方法时的辐射暴露比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 1;90(2):243-248. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26851. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
10
Performance of One- Compared With Two-Catheter Concepts in Transradial Coronary Angiography (from the Randomized Use of Different Diagnostic Catheters-Radial-Trial).经桡动脉入路应用不同诊断导管的随机对照研究(RADIAL 试验):单导管与双导管技术在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中的应用比较
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1647-1651. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.039. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of One-Catheter Strategy with TIG I Catheter on Coronary Catheterization Performance and Economic Costs.TIG I 导管单导管策略对冠状动脉造影性能和经济成本的影响。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Nov;113(5):960-968. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190232.
2
Predictors of Universal Catheter Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中通用导管失败的预测因素
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Nov;31(11):341-345. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
3
Efficacy and Safety of "Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography" with Right Transradial Access versus Left Transradial Access and Femoral Access: a Retrospective Comparative Study.
经右侧桡动脉入路与左侧桡动脉入路及股动脉入路行“冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影术”的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性比较研究
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan-Feb;34(1):48-56. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0270.
4
Size Matters: Moving Toward a Slender Transradial Artery Approach.尺寸很重要:迈向纤细的桡动脉入路
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jun;19(4):401-402. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.012.