Suppr超能文献

后半月板根部修复:解剖经胫骨拉出技术的结果

Posterior Meniscal Root Repairs: Outcomes of an Anatomic Transtibial Pull-Out Technique.

作者信息

LaPrade Robert F, Matheny Lauren M, Moulton Samuel G, James Evan W, Dean Chase S

机构信息

The Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail, Colorado, USA.

The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(4):884-891. doi: 10.1177/0363546516673996. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after transtibial pull-out repair for posterior meniscal root tears remain underreported, and factors that may affect outcomes are unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare patient-centered outcomes after transtibial pull-out repair for posterior root tears in patients <50 and ≥50 years of age. We hypothesized that improvement in function and activity level at minimum 2-year follow-up would be similar among patients <50 years of age compared with patients ≥50 years and among patients undergoing medial versus lateral root repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older who underwent anatomic transtibial pull-out repair of the medial or lateral posterior meniscus root by a single surgeon. All patients were identified from a data registry consisting of prospectively collected data in a consecutive series. Cohorts were analyzed by age (<50 years [n = 35] vs ≥50 years [n = 15]) and laterality (lateral [n = 15] vs medial [n = 35]). Patients completed a subjective questionnaire preoperatively and at minimum of 2 years postoperatively (Lysholm, Tegner, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], and patient satisfaction with outcome). Failure was defined as revision meniscal root repair or partial meniscectomy.

RESULTS

The analysis included 50 knees in 49 patients (16 females, 33 males; mean age, 38.3 years; mean body mass index, 26.6). Of the 50 knees, 45 were available for analysis. Three of 45 (6.7%) required revision surgery. All failures were in patients <50 years old, and all failures underwent medial root repair. No significant difference in failure was found based on age ( P=.541) or laterality ( P = .544). For age cohorts, Lysholm and WOMAC scores demonstrated significant postoperative improvement. For laterality cohorts, all functional scores significantly improved postoperatively. No significant difference was noted in postoperative Lysholm, WOMAC, SF-12, Tegner, or patient satisfaction scores for the age cohort or the laterality cohort.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes after posterior meniscal root repair significantly improved postoperatively and patient satisfaction was high, regardless of age or meniscal laterality. Patients <50 years had outcomes similar to those of patients ≥50 years, as did patients who underwent medial versus lateral root repair. Transtibial double-tunnel pull-out meniscal root repair provided improvement in function, pain, and activity level, which may aid in delayed progression of knee osteoarthritis.

摘要

背景

经胫骨拔出修复后内侧半月板根部撕裂的疗效报道较少,且可能影响疗效的因素尚不清楚。目的/假设:本研究的目的是比较年龄<50岁和≥50岁患者经胫骨拔出修复后内侧半月板根部撕裂以患者为中心的疗效。我们假设,在至少2年的随访中,年龄<50岁的患者与年龄≥50岁的患者以及接受内侧与外侧根部修复的患者相比,功能和活动水平的改善情况相似。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

纳入标准为年龄18岁及以上、由同一位外科医生进行内侧或外侧后半月板根部解剖学经胫骨拔出修复的患者。所有患者均从一个数据登记库中识别出来,该登记库由一系列连续前瞻性收集的数据组成。队列按年龄(<50岁[n = 35] vs≥50岁[n = 15])和侧别(外侧[n = 15] vs内侧[n = 35])进行分析。患者在术前和术后至少2年完成一份主观问卷(Lysholm评分、Tegner评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数[WOMAC]、12项简短健康调查[SF - 12]以及患者对疗效的满意度)。失败定义为半月板根部修复翻修或半月板部分切除术。

结果

分析包括49例患者的50个膝关节(16例女性,33例男性;平均年龄38.3岁;平均体重指数26.6)。50个膝关节中,45个可用于分析。其中45个中有3个(6.7%)需要翻修手术。所有失败病例均为年龄<50岁的患者,且所有失败病例均接受了内侧根部修复。基于年龄(P = 0.541)或侧别(P = 0.544)未发现失败率有显著差异。对于年龄队列,Lysholm评分和WOMAC评分术后有显著改善。对于侧别队列,所有功能评分术后均显著改善。年龄队列或侧别队列的术后Lysholm评分、WOMAC评分、SF - 12评分、Tegner评分或患者满意度评分均未发现显著差异。

结论

后半月板根部修复术后疗效显著改善,患者满意度高,无论年龄或半月板侧别如何。年龄<50岁的患者与年龄≥50岁的患者疗效相似,接受内侧与外侧根部修复的患者疗效也相似。经胫骨双隧道拔出半月板根部修复改善了功能、疼痛和活动水平,这可能有助于延缓膝关节骨关节炎的进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验