Homan Morgan D, Solaiman Rafat H, Braaten Jacob A, Kennedy Nicholas I, LaPrade Robert F
Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Video J Sports Med. 2023 May 4;3(3):26350254231162113. doi: 10.1177/26350254231162113. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
Lateral meniscal root tears often occur in the acute setting in concert with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Severe changes in tibiofemoral biomechanics and joint degeneration are encountered when these injuries are either unrecognized or are treated with meniscectomy; therefore, meniscal root surgical repair is now preferred for longer-term benefits. The most common repair techniques include side-to-side and transtibial pull-out repair, which may be performed via single or double transtibial tunnel techniques.
The primary indication for lateral meniscal root repair with double transtibial tunnels is suspicion for a lateral meniscal root tear based upon injury mechanism, physical examination findings, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and confirmation with diagnostic arthroscopy.
The root attachment site is decorticated. Adhesions that cause lateral meniscal root retraction are arthroscopically released. Two separate transtibial tunnels are drilled 5 mm apart from the anterolateral tibia, entering the anterolateral tibia distal to Gerdy's tubercle and entering the joint at the decorticated lateral root attachment site. Two suture tapes are passed through the torn lateral meniscal root in a vertical mattress configuration and shuttled with a passing suture through the tibial tunnels. The suture tapes are tied over a surgical button on the anterolateral tibia with the knee flexed to approximately 90° while the repair is viewed arthroscopically.
Lateral meniscal root repairs are safe and have very low reoperation rates. It has been reported that the transtibial pullout repair technique of the lateral meniscus significantly decreases lateral meniscus extrusion compared with other repair techniques in patients with combined ACL reconstruction. Zhuo et al also reported significantly improved postoperative clinical outcomes compared with the preoperative state in patients who underwent pullout repair for posterior lateral meniscal root avulsion tears.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The biomechanical and clinical evidence supports concomitant lateral meniscal root repair in the setting of concurrent ACL injury, and no studies to date have demonstrated a clear harm associated with this procedure. In addition, failure to repair the lateral meniscal root places supraphysiologic loads on the ACL graft and may increase the risk of graft failure.
The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
外侧半月板根部撕裂常与前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂同时在急性情况下发生。当这些损伤未被识别或采用半月板切除术治疗时,会出现胫股生物力学的严重改变和关节退变;因此,为获得更长期的益处,目前外侧半月板根部手术修复更受青睐。最常见的修复技术包括端端和经胫骨拉出修复,可通过单隧道或双隧道技术进行。
双隧道外侧半月板根部修复的主要适应症是基于损伤机制、体格检查结果、磁共振成像结果以及诊断性关节镜检查确认,怀疑存在外侧半月板根部撕裂。
对根部附着部位进行去皮质处理。通过关节镜松解导致外侧半月板根部回缩的粘连。从胫骨前外侧钻出两条相距5毫米的独立经胫骨隧道,进入Gerdy结节远端的胫骨前外侧,并在去皮质的外侧根部附着部位进入关节。两条缝线带以垂直褥式缝合的方式穿过撕裂的外侧半月板根部,并用一根穿线缝线穿过胫骨隧道。在膝关节屈曲至约90°时,在胫骨前外侧的手术纽扣上系紧缝线带,同时通过关节镜观察修复情况。
外侧半月板根部修复是安全的,再次手术率非常低。据报道,在合并ACL重建的患者中,外侧半月板经胫骨拉出修复技术与其他修复技术相比,能显著减少外侧半月板的挤压。卓等人还报告称,与术前状态相比,接受后外侧半月板根部撕脱伤拉出修复的患者术后临床结果有显著改善。
讨论/结论:生物力学和临床证据支持在并发ACL损伤时同时进行外侧半月板根部修复,且迄今为止尚无研究表明该手术存在明显危害。此外,未修复外侧半月板根部会使ACL移植物承受超生理负荷,并可能增加移植物失败的风险。
作者证明已获得本出版物中出现的任何患者的同意。如果个体可能被识别,作者已随本稿件提交包含患者发布声明或其他书面批准形式。