Hjortkjær Henrik Øder, Jensen Tonny, Kofoed Klaus F, Mogensen Ulrik M, Sigvardsen Per Ejlstrup, Køber Lars, Hilsted Karen Lisa, Corinth Helle, Theilade Simone, Hilsted Jannik
Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 5;6(12):e012307. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012307.
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and abnormal circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm are independent cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes and associations between CAN, non-dipping of nocturnal BP and coronary artery disease have been demonstrated. We aimed to test if bedtime dosing (BD) versus morning dosing (MD) of the ACE inhibitor enalapril would affect the 24-hour BP profile in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), CAN and non-dipping.
Secondary healthcare unit in Copenhagen, Denmark.
24 normoalbuminuric patients with T1D with CAN and non-dipping were included, consisting of mixed gender and Caucasian origin. Mean±SD age, glycosylated haemoglobin and diabetes duration were 60±7 years, 7.9±0.7% (62±7 mmol/mol) and 36±11 years.
In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study, the patients were treated for 12 weeks with either MD (20 mg enalapril in the morning and placebo at bedtime) or BD (placebo in the morning and 20 mg enalapril at bedtime), followed by 12 weeks of switched treatment regimen.
Primary outcome was altered dipping of nocturnal BP. Secondary outcomes included a measurable effect on other cardiovascular risk factors than BP, including left ventricular function (LVF).
Systolic BP dipping increased 2.4% (0.03-4.9%; p=0.048) with BD compared to MD of enalapril. There was no increase in mean arterial pressure dipping (2.2% (-0.1% to 4.5%; p=0.07)). No difference was found on measures of LVF (p≥0.15). No adverse events were registered during the study.
We demonstrated that patients with T1D with CAN and non-dipping can be treated with an ACE inhibitor at night as BD as opposed to MD increased BP dipping, thereby diminishing the abnormal BP profile. The potentially beneficial effect on long-term cardiovascular risk remains to be determined.
EudraCT2012-002136-90; Post-results.
心血管自主神经病变(CAN)和异常的昼夜血压(BP)节律是糖尿病患者独立的心血管危险因素,并且CAN、夜间血压非勺型变化与冠状动脉疾病之间的关联已得到证实。我们旨在测试血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂依那普利睡前给药(BD)与晨起给药(MD)是否会影响1型糖尿病(T1D)、CAN和血压非勺型变化患者的24小时血压情况。
丹麦哥本哈根的二级医疗单位。
纳入24例T1D伴CAN且血压非勺型变化的正常白蛋白尿患者,男女混合,均为白种人。平均年龄±标准差、糖化血红蛋白和糖尿病病程分别为60±7岁、7.9±0.7%(62±7 mmol/mol)和36±11年。
在这项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲交叉研究中,患者接受12周的MD治疗(晨起服用20 mg依那普利,睡前服用安慰剂)或BD治疗(晨起服用安慰剂,睡前服用20 mg依那普利),随后进行12周的治疗方案切换。
主要观察指标是夜间血压勺型变化的改变。次要观察指标包括对除血压外的其他心血管危险因素的可测量影响,包括左心室功能(LVF)。
与依那普利MD相比,BD治疗时收缩压勺型变化增加了2.4%(0.03 - 4.9%;p = 0.048)。平均动脉压勺型变化没有增加(2.2%(-0.1%至4.5%;p = 0.07))。LVF测量指标无差异(p≥0.15)。研究期间未记录到不良事件。
我们证明,T1D伴CAN且血压非勺型变化的患者可以在夜间服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂进行BD治疗,与MD相比,BD可增加血压勺型变化,从而改善异常血压情况。对长期心血管风险的潜在有益影响仍有待确定。
EudraCT2012 - 002136 - 90;结果公布后。