Călin Pop, Viorel Manea, Luchiana Pruna, Mihaela Cosma, Lavinia Pop
Emergency Clinical County Hospital Baia Mare, Str George Cosbuc Nr 31, 430130, Baia Mare, Romania.
Faculty of Medicine Arad, "Vasile Goldis" University, 310025, Arad, Romania.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Sep 15;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00899-6.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) show the dipping patterns, identify masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH), and demonstrate the effectiveness of the blood pressure (BP) treatment. MUCH is associated with a two-fold higher risk of adverse events. Prevalence in patients with DM is between 13.3 and 66.4%. Our study aims to investigate the prevalence of MUCH and the BP patterns in a population of apparently well-controlled hypertensive patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). A second aspect was the assessment of the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment.
One hundred and sixty-three consecutively treated hypertensive patients with T2DM and an office BP between 130-139 and 80-89 mmHg performed a 24 h ABPM. The circadian BP variation, the presence of MUCH, and the correlations with the treatment were assessed.
There were 75 dippers (46.02%), 77 non-dippers (47.23%), 4 reverse dippers (2.45%), and 7 extreme dippers (4.30%). Eighty-one patients (77 non-dippers + 4 reverse dippers; 49.7%) had isolated nocturnal MUCH according to the mean night ABPM criteria. Dippers and extreme dippers (75 dippers + 7 extreme dippers; 51.3%) did not have any MUCH criteria. The patients took, on an average, 3 antihypertensive drugs with no difference between those with controlled HTN and the isolated nocturnal MUCH group. Significant factors associated with isolated nocturnal MUCH and a non-dipping BP pattern included age > 65 years (OR = 1.9), DM duration > 10 years (OR = 1.4), HTN duration > 6.5 years (OR = 1.2), obesity (OR = 1.6), and cardiovascular comorbidities (OR = 1.4).
The current study shows that half of the treated hypertensive patients with T2DM and office clinical normotension are non-dippers or reverse dippers. They experience isolated nocturnal MUCH due to their elevated nocturnal BP values, which comply with the actual definition of masked nocturnal hypertension. Bedtime chronotherapy in those patients could be linked to better effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment during the night with the important goal of reducing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events. ABPM should be performed in hypertensive patients with DM for better risk stratification and more effective control of HTN.
糖尿病(DM)合并高血压(HTN)患者的动态血压监测(ABPM)可显示血压波动模式,识别隐匿性未控制高血压(MUCH),并证明血压(BP)治疗的有效性。MUCH与不良事件风险高出两倍相关。DM患者中的患病率在13.3%至66.4%之间。我们的研究旨在调查2型糖尿病(T2DM)且表面血压控制良好的高血压患者群体中MUCH的患病率和血压模式。第二个方面是评估降压治疗的有效性。
163例连续接受治疗的T2DM高血压患者,诊室血压在130 - 139和80 - 89 mmHg之间,进行了24小时ABPM。评估昼夜血压变化、MUCH的存在情况以及与治疗的相关性。
有75例杓型血压者(46.02%),77例非杓型血压者(47.23%),4例反杓型血压者(2.45%),7例极端杓型血压者(4.30%)。根据夜间平均ABPM标准,81例患者(77例非杓型血压者 + 4例反杓型血压者;49.7%)存在孤立性夜间MUCH。杓型血压者和极端杓型血压者(75例杓型血压者 + 7例极端杓型血压者;51.3%)不符合任何MUCH标准。患者平均服用3种降压药物,血压控制良好者与孤立性夜间MUCH组之间无差异。与孤立性夜间MUCH和非杓型血压模式相关的显著因素包括年龄 > 65岁(OR = 1.9)、DM病程 > 10年(OR = 1.4)、HTN病程 > 6.5年(OR = 1.2)、肥胖(OR = 1.6)和心血管合并症(OR = 1.4)。
当前研究表明,一半接受治疗的T2DM高血压患者且诊室临床血压正常者为非杓型或反杓型血压者。他们因夜间血压升高而出现孤立性夜间MUCH,这符合隐匿性夜间高血压的实际定义。对这些患者进行睡前时间疗法可能与夜间降压治疗的更好效果相关,其重要目标是减少心脑血管不良事件。对于DM高血压患者应进行ABPM,以实现更好的风险分层和更有效的HTN控制。