Schon Jason M, Mikula Jacob D, Backus Jonathon D, Venderley Melanie B, Dornan Grant J, LaPrade Robert F, Clanton Thomas O
1 Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
2 The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Apr;38(4):436-442. doi: 10.1177/1071100716681605. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
The effect of ankle positioning during suture-button fixation for syndesmosis repair on range of motion (ROM) and anatomic reduction has yet to be investigated. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to compare the effects of 3 different ankle positions during suture-button repair on volumetric reduction of the syndesmosis, fibular displacement, and ROM of the ankle using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) analysis. The null hypothesis was that ankle position during fixation would not affect syndesmotic volume restoration, fibular displacement, or ROM.
Twelve matched pair (n = 24) human cadaveric specimens were used for this study. Prior to syndesmotic sectioning, ROM assessment and CT scans were performed. Following sectioning of the syndesmosis, specimens were repaired in plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, or neutral, and simulated postrepair ROM evaluations and CT scans were repeated. Least squares mean differences between repair groups and the preinjury state were compared by analysis of variance and Tukey's method.
There were no significant differences between repair groups for volumetric reduction ( P = .917), fibular displacement (anterior-posterior, P = .805; medial-lateral, P = .949), or dorsiflexion capacity ( P = .249). Among all specimens, compared with the preinjury state, there was a significant mean ± SD volume reduction of 337 ± 400 mm and medial displacement of 1.9 ± 1.5 mm.
This study failed to reject the null hypothesis and demonstrated that ankle flexion at the time of syndesmotic fixation with a suture-button construct had no significant in vitro effect on volume changes, fibular displacement, or dorsiflexion capacity. However, in comparison to the preinjured state, suture-button repair resulted in significant overcompression with respect to syndesmosis volume and medial displacement of the fibula.
Ankle position at the time of syndesmotic fixation did not affect overall ankle ROM when using a suture-button construct; however, overcompression was observed in all positions. The clinical impact of syndesmotic overcompression remains largely unknown.
在采用缝线纽扣固定修复下胫腓联合时,踝关节位置对活动范围(ROM)和解剖复位的影响尚未得到研究。本尸体研究的目的是使用三维计算机断层扫描(CT)分析,比较缝线纽扣修复过程中3种不同踝关节位置对下胫腓联合容积减小、腓骨移位和踝关节ROM的影响。无效假设为固定过程中的踝关节位置不会影响下胫腓联合容积恢复、腓骨移位或ROM。
本研究使用了12对匹配的(n = 24)人体尸体标本。在下胫腓联合切断之前,进行ROM评估和CT扫描。在下胫腓联合切断后,标本在跖屈、背屈或中立位进行修复,并重复模拟修复后的ROM评估和CT扫描。通过方差分析和Tukey方法比较修复组与损伤前状态之间的最小二乘均值差异。
修复组在容积减小(P = .917)、腓骨移位(前后方向,P = .805;内外侧方向,P = .949)或背屈能力(P = .249)方面无显著差异。在所有标本中,与损伤前状态相比,平均容积显著减小±标准差为337 ± 400 mm,内侧移位为1.9 ± 1.5 mm。
本研究未能拒绝无效假设,并表明在使用缝线纽扣结构进行下胫腓联合固定时,踝关节屈曲对容积变化、腓骨移位或背屈能力在体外无显著影响。然而,与损伤前状态相比,缝线纽扣修复导致下胫腓联合容积和腓骨内侧移位出现显著的过度压缩。
使用缝线纽扣结构进行下胫腓联合固定时,踝关节位置不影响踝关节的整体ROM;然而,在所有位置均观察到过度压缩。下胫腓联合过度压缩的临床影响在很大程度上仍然未知。