• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

119例巨大胃肠道间质瘤的临床特征及预后分析

[Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of 119 cases with giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor].

作者信息

Zhang Peng, Zeng Xiangyu, Gao Jinbo, Liu Weizhen, Shuai Xiaoming, Liu Ke, Liu Xinghua, Cai Ming, Cai Kailin, Wang Guobin, Tao Kaixiong

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 25;19(11):1290-1295.

PMID:27928802
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment as well as prognostic factors of the giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

METHODS

Clinical data of 235 patients with high risk GIST treated in the Union Hospital, Tongi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 2005 and July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into giant GIST group (diameter equal to or larger than 10 cm, 119 cases) and high risk group (diameter less than 10 cm, 116 cases) according to tumor size. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of two groups were compared and the clinical features of giant GIST were summarized. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic factors of giant GIST with Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 119 patients with giant GIST, which accounted for 50.6%(119/235) of all the high risk patients, there were 63 male and 56 female patients with a median age of 53(20-82) years. Primary giant GIST of 43(36.1%) located in the stomach, of 39(32.8%) in the small intestine, 5(4.2%) in the colon and rectum, and of 32 (26.9%) outside the gastrointestinal tract (mesentery, retroperitoneum, abdominal cavity, etc) and pelvic. Compared to high risk group, age of onset was younger [ratio of ≤50 years, 44.5%(53/119) vs. 31.9%(37/116), P = 0.046] and incidence of outside the gastrointestinal tract was significantly higher [26.9%(32/119) vs. 9.5%(11/116), P=0.000] in giant GIST group. All the giant GIST patients underwent surgical resection, including 115 cases(96.6%) of R0 resection, 3 cases(2.5%) of R1 resection and 1 case(0.9%) of R2 resection, besides, 32 cases(26.9%) underwent expanded resection (namely, underwent lymphadenectomy or combined organ resection simultaneously). Thirty-nine giant GIST cases(32.8%)accepted imatinib 400 mg/d for targeted therapy after operations, which was not significantly different with high risk group (46 cases, 39.6%, P=0.232). Relapse and metastasis occurred in 8 cases in giant GIST group. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates of giant GIST group were 94.5%, 89.3%, 79.4% respectively and of high risk group were 99.1%, 92.9%, 85.1% respectively, and no significant difference was found (P=0.788). The 1-, 3-, 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of giant GIST group were 93.6%, 85.1%, 72.8% respectively and of high risk group were 99.1%, 91.7%, 84.2% respectively, and no significant difference was found as well (P=0.932). Multivariate analysis revealed that gender (P=0.047, RR=0.383, 95%CI:0.149-0.987), mitotic count (P=0.001, RR=0.216, 95%CI:0.087-0.538) and targeted therapy(P=0.019, RR=5.719, 95%CI:1.324-24.695) were prognostic risk factors of overall survival (OS), moreover, tumor size (P=0.024, RR=0.368, 95%CI:0.155-0.875) and mitotic count(P=0.007, RR=0.357, 95%CI:0.169-0.755) were prognostic risk factors of RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Giant GIST is not unusual in GIST and more likely occurs outside gastrointestinal tract. Complete surgical excision combined with targeted therapy can improve the prognosis significantly. The prognosis of giant GIST and common high risk GIST is similar. Mitotic count is the most important prognostic factor.

摘要

目的

探讨巨大胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的临床特征、诊断治疗及预后因素。

方法

回顾性分析2005年1月至2015年7月在华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院接受治疗的235例高危GIST患者的临床资料。根据肿瘤大小将患者分为巨大GIST组(直径大于或等于10 cm,119例)和高危组(直径小于10 cm,116例)。比较两组的临床特征及预后,并总结巨大GIST的临床特点。采用Cox回归模型进行多因素分析,评估巨大GIST的预后因素。

结果

119例巨大GIST患者占所有高危患者的50.6%(119/235),其中男性63例,女性56例,中位年龄53(20 - 82)岁。43例(36.1%)原发性巨大GIST位于胃,39例(32.8%)位于小肠,5例(4.2%)位于结肠和直肠,32例(26.9%)位于胃肠道外(肠系膜、腹膜后、腹腔等)及盆腔。与高危组相比,巨大GIST组发病年龄较轻[≤50岁比例,44.5%(53/119)对31.9%(37/116),P = 0.046],胃肠道外发生率显著更高[26.9%(32/119)对9.5%(11/116),P = 0.000]。所有巨大GIST患者均接受手术切除,其中R0切除115例(96.6%),R1切除3例(2.5%),R2切除1例(0.9%),此外,32例(26.9%)接受扩大切除(即同时行淋巴结清扫或联合器官切除)。39例巨大GIST患者(32.8%)术后接受伊马替尼400 mg/d靶向治疗,与高危组(46例,39.6%)相比差异无统计学意义(P = 0.232)。巨大GIST组8例出现复发转移。巨大GIST组患者1、3、5年总生存率分别为94.5%、89.3%、79.4%,高危组分别为99.1%、92.9%、85.1%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.788)。巨大GIST组患者1、3、5年无复发生存率分别为93.6%、85.1%、72.8%,高危组分别为99.1%、91.7%、84.2%,差异也无统计学意义(P = 0.932)。多因素分析显示,性别(P = 0.047,RR = 0.383,95%CI:0.149 - 0.987)、核分裂象计数(P = 0.001,RR = 0.216,95%CI:0.087 - 0.538)和靶向治疗(P = 0.019,RR = 5.719,95%CI:1.324 - 24.695)是总生存(OS)的预后危险因素;此外,肿瘤大小(P = 0.024,RR = 0.368,95%CI:0.155 - 0.875)和核分裂象计数(P = 0.007,RR = 0.357,95%CI:0.169 - 0.755)是无复发生存(RFS)的预后危险因素。

结论

巨大GIST在GIST中并不少见,且更易发生于胃肠道外。完整手术切除联合靶向治疗可显著改善预后。巨大GIST与普通高危GIST的预后相似。核分裂象计数是最重要的预后因素。

相似文献

1
[Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of 119 cases with giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor].119例巨大胃肠道间质瘤的临床特征及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 25;19(11):1290-1295.
2
[Changes of diagnosis and treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors during a 18-year period in four medical centers of China].[中国四个医学中心18年间胃肠道间质瘤的诊治变化]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 25;19(11):1265-1270.
3
[Treatment and prognosis of 108 patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor].108例高危胃肠道间质瘤患者的治疗与预后
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 25;19(11):1300-1304.
4
Prognostic analysis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single unit experience with surgical treatment of primary disease.胃肠道间质瘤患者的预后分析:单一单位原发性疾病手术治疗经验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Jan 20;123(2):131-6.
5
[Clinical pathological features and prognosis analysis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a series of 558 cases].胃肠道间质瘤的临床病理特征及预后分析:558例病例系列研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;53(4):274-9.
6
[Analysis of clinical features and prognostic factors on reoperation patients with postoperative recurrence or metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor].胃肠道间质瘤术后复发转移再手术患者临床特征及预后因素分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 25;21(11):1274-1279.
7
[Current status of surgical treatment of gastric gastrointestinal tumors: a national multi-center retrospective study].[胃胃肠道肿瘤的外科治疗现状:一项全国多中心回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 25;19(11):1258-1264.
8
[Analysis of imatinib trough concentration at steady state in adjuvant therapy of patients with high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor].[高危胃肠道间质瘤患者辅助治疗中伊马替尼稳态谷浓度分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 25;22(9):848-855. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.09.009.
9
Is 3-years duration of adjuvant imatinib mesylate treatment sufficient for patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor? A study based on long-term follow-up.对于高危胃肠道间质瘤患者,3年的甲磺酸伊马替尼辅助治疗疗程是否足够?一项基于长期随访的研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;143(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2334-x. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
[A multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Shandong Province].[山东省胃肠道间质瘤患者的多中心回顾性队列研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;17(4):326-30.