Michálek Pavel, Donaldson Will, McAleavey Francis, Abraham Alexander, Mathers Rachel J, Telford Claire
Department of Anaesthetics, Antrim Area Hospital, Northern HSC Trust, Antrim, United Kingdom.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Prague Med Rep. 2016;117(4):164-175. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2016.17.
Fibreoptic intubation through a supraglottic airway is an alternative plan for airway management in difficult or failed laryngoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare three supraglottic airways as conduits in patients with at least one predictor for difficult laryngoscopy. The i-gel was compared with the single-use intubating laryngeal mask airway (sILMA) and CTrach laryngeal mask in 120 adult patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia using a prospective, randomized and single-blinded design. Primary outcome was success rate of tracheal intubation through the device, while secondary outcomes were times required for device insertion and tracheal tube placement, fibreoptic scores and the incidence of perioperative complications and postoperative complaints. The success rates showed no statistical difference between devices (i-gel 100%, CTrach 97.5%, ILMA 95%). Insertion time was shortest for the i-gel (12.4 s) compared with ILMA (19.3 s) and CTrach (24.4 s). Intubation time was shorter in the i-gel group (29.4 s) in comparison with the CTrach (39.8 s, p<0.05) and sILMA (51.9 s, p<0.001) groups. Best fibreoptic scores were observed also in the i-gel group. In total, 24 patients (20%) presented with difficult laryngoscopy. The i-gel showed significantly shorter times for insertion and fibreoptic intubation than the other two devices in this group. No difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complaints. The i-gel is a suitable alternative to the sILMA and CTrach for fibrescope-guided tracheal intubation. Shorter insertion and intubation times with the i-gel may provide advantage in case of difficult oxygenation.
通过声门上气道进行纤维光导喉镜插管是困难喉镜检查或喉镜检查失败时气道管理的替代方案。本研究的目的是比较三种声门上气道作为困难喉镜检查至少有一项预测指标患者的导管。采用前瞻性、随机、单盲设计,将i-gel与一次性插管喉罩气道(sILMA)和CTrach喉罩在120例计划在全身麻醉下进行择期手术的成年患者中进行比较。主要结局是通过该装置进行气管插管的成功率,次要结局是装置插入和气管导管放置所需时间、纤维光导评分以及围手术期并发症和术后不适的发生率。各装置之间的成功率无统计学差异(i-gel为100%,CTrach为97.5%,ILMA为95%)。与ILMA(19.3秒)和CTrach(24.4秒)相比,i-gel的插入时间最短(12.4秒)。与CTrach组(39.8秒,p<0.05)和sILMA组(51.9秒,p<0.001)相比,i-gel组的插管时间更短(29.4秒)。i-gel组的纤维光导评分也最佳。共有24例患者(20%)出现困难喉镜检查。在该组中,i-gel的插入和纤维光导喉镜插管时间明显短于其他两种装置。术后不适的发生率无差异。对于纤维支气管镜引导的气管插管,i-gel是sILMA和CTrach的合适替代方案。i-gel较短的插入和插管时间在困难氧合情况下可能具有优势。