Metterlein Thomas, Dintenfelder Anna, Plank Christoph, Graf Bernhard, Roth Gabriel
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Regensburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Regensburg, Germany.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017 Mar-Apr;67(2):166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.09.007. Epub 2016 May 26.
Fiberoptical assisted intubation via placed supraglottic airway devices has been described as safe and easy procedure to manage difficult airways. However visualization of the glottis aperture is essential for fiberoptical assisted intubation. Various different supraglottic airway devices are commercially available and might offer different conditions for fiberoptical assisted intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the best obtainable view of the glottic aperture using different supraglottic airway devices.
With approval of the local ethics committee 52 adult patients undergoing elective anesthesia were randomly assigned to a supraglottic airway device (Laryngeal Tube, Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel, Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique, Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme, Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once). After standardized induction of anesthesia the supraglottic airway device was placed according to the manufacturers recommendations. After successful ventilation the position of the supraglottic airway device in regard to the glottic opening was examined with a flexible fiberscope. A fully or partially visible glottic aperture was considered as suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation. Suitability for fiberoptical assisted intubation was compared between the groups (H-test, U-test; p<0.05).
Demographic data was not different between the groups. Placement of the supraglottic airway device and adequate ventilation was successful in all attempts. Glottic view suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation differed between the devices ranging from 40% for the laringeal tube (LT), 66% for the laryngeal mask airway Supreme, 70% for the Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel and 90% for both the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once.
None of the used supraglottic airway devices offered a full or partial glottic view in all cases. However the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once seem to be more suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation compared to other devices.
经放置的声门上气道装置进行光纤辅助插管已被描述为一种管理困难气道的安全且简便的方法。然而,声门开口的可视化对于光纤辅助插管至关重要。市场上有各种不同的声门上气道装置,它们可能为光纤辅助插管提供不同的条件。本研究的目的是比较使用不同声门上气道装置时可获得的声门开口的最佳视野。
经当地伦理委员会批准,52例接受择期麻醉的成年患者被随机分配至一种声门上气道装置(喉管、I-Gel型喉罩气道、Unique型喉罩气道、Supreme型喉罩气道、Aura-once型喉罩气道)。在标准化麻醉诱导后,根据制造商的建议放置声门上气道装置。成功通气后,用柔性纤维喉镜检查声门上气道装置相对于声门开口的位置。声门开口完全或部分可见被认为适合光纤辅助插管。比较各组之间光纤辅助插管的适用性(H检验、U检验;p<0.05)。
各组间人口统计学数据无差异。所有尝试中声门上气道装置的放置和充分通气均成功。适合光纤辅助插管的声门视野在不同装置之间有所不同,喉管(LT)为40%,Supreme型喉罩气道为66%,I-Gel型喉罩气道为70%,Unique型喉罩气道和Aura-once型喉罩气道均为90%。
所使用的声门上气道装置在所有情况下均未提供完全或部分声门视野。然而,与其他装置相比,Unique型喉罩气道和Aura-once型喉罩气道似乎更适合光纤辅助插管。