Suppr超能文献

通过对大鼠单次口服叠氮胸苷来评估PIGRET检测法。

Evaluation of the PIGRET assay in rats by single oral dosing with azidothymidine.

作者信息

Sanada Hisakazu, Ohsumi Tomoka, Koyama Naomi, Miyashita Taishi, Hashimoto Kazuto

机构信息

Pharmacokinetics and Safety Department, Drug Research Center, Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 301, Gensuke, Fujieda-shi, Shizuoka 426-8646, Japan.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety Department, Drug Research Center, Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 301, Gensuke, Fujieda-shi, Shizuoka 426-8646, Japan.

出版信息

Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2016 Nov 15;811:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

Abstract

In vivo phosphatidylinositol glycan, class A (Pig-a) gene mutation assay using peripheral blood is known to be a novel and useful tool to evaluate the mutagenicity of compounds. Recently, the rat PIGRET assay which is an improved method for measuring Pig-a mutant cells in reticulocytes with magnetic enrichment of CD71 positive cells has been developed. Several reports showed that the PIGRET assay could detect the increase of Pig-a mutant frequency earlier than the Pig-a assay in total red blood cells (RBC Pig-a assay). Therefore, as part of a collaborative study by the Mammalian Mutagenicity Study (MMS) Group of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, the usefulness of the PIGRET assay in comparison to the RBC Pig-a assay has been assessed for 24 compounds with various mechanisms of action. In the present study, we performed the PIGRET assay and RBC Pig-a assay with a nucleoside analogue, azidothymidine (AZT), and compared the results in these assays. We administered a single dose of AZT to rats by oral gavage up to 2000mg/kg and examined Pig-a mutant frequencies at days 7, 14 and 28 by PIGRET and RBC Pig-a assays. No significant increases in mutant frequency were observed after administration of AZT in both the RBC Pig-a and PIGRET assays and comparable to the previous results of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) workgroup. AZT has been thought to induce not only DNA chain termination as a pharmacological effect but also a large deletion on the genome DNA. The Pig-a assays may be less sensitive to compounds such as AZT which induce large deletions on the genome DNA.

摘要

利用外周血进行体内磷脂酰肌醇聚糖A类(Pig-a)基因突变试验是评估化合物致突变性的一种新颖且有用的工具。最近,已开发出大鼠PIGRET试验,这是一种改进方法,用于通过磁性富集CD71阳性细胞来测量网织红细胞中的Pig-a突变细胞。几份报告表明,PIGRET试验比全红细胞中的Pig-a试验(RBC Pig-a试验)能更早地检测到Pig-a突变频率的增加。因此,作为日本环境诱变剂学会哺乳动物致突变性研究(MMS)小组合作研究的一部分,已对24种具有不同作用机制的化合物评估了PIGRET试验相对于RBC Pig-a试验的有效性。在本研究中,我们用核苷类似物叠氮胸苷(AZT)进行了PIGRET试验和RBC Pig-a试验,并比较了这些试验的结果。我们通过口服灌胃给大鼠单次给予高达2000mg/kg的AZT,并在第7、14和28天通过PIGRET试验和RBC Pig-a试验检测Pig-a突变频率。在RBC Pig-a试验和PIGRET试验中,给予AZT后均未观察到突变频率有显著增加,且与遗传毒性测试国际研讨会(IWGT)工作组的先前结果相当。AZT不仅被认为作为一种药理作用会诱导DNA链终止,还会导致基因组DNA的大片段缺失。Pig-a试验可能对诱导基因组DNA大片段缺失的化合物(如AZT)不太敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验