Kennett Jeanette
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan;26(1):69-81. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000657.
The spread of demands by physicians and allied health professionals for accommodation of their private ethical, usually religiously based, objections to providing care of a particular type, or to a particular class of persons, suggests the need for a re-evaluation of conscientious objection in healthcare and how it should be regulated. I argue on Kantian grounds that respect for conscience and protection of freedom of conscience is consistent with fairly stringent limitations and regulations governing refusal of service in healthcare settings. Respect for conscience does not entail that refusal of service should be cost free to the objector. I suggest that conscientious objection in medicine should be conceptualized and treated analogously to civil disobedience.
医生和专职医疗人员要求迁就其出于个人道德(通常基于宗教)而反对提供特定类型的护理或为特定类别的人提供护理的呼声不断蔓延,这表明有必要重新评估医疗保健中的良心拒服兵役以及应如何对其进行监管。我基于康德的观点认为,尊重良心和保护良心自由与对医疗环境中拒绝服务的相当严格的限制和规定是一致的。尊重良心并不意味着拒绝服务对反对者来说应该是没有代价的。我建议,医学中的良心拒服兵役应被概念化并与公民抗命类似地对待。